From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com (mail-lj1-f180.google.com [209.85.208.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6BF405C3 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="pTTr8bPi" Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cca8eb0509so45360571fa.3 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:55:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1704884147; x=1705488947; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XovDo6g71dUW3xxSlFZ5p2kN6+6ojspuCXXtemQJf10=; b=pTTr8bPi4cOMTVM2Z7l6d6g6datRjbDOQJrbsgodBNOeDvd+yyw1poWVPQWoU49W+F 61dm0GUT0F4X60md0voYZ6BGI/PPYc51xph3HPTffWn3ANR6kTHhQjPmvdd91N+Tf19u oEzUdtppV18u1+c1wD+Ba0Ic/1fi3G0H7E4N/IVh3OOIVR2+ofq7qXc5CzGzEoKlXyJ3 t4tl2DoF8hP9OWJcXZ/IdhyLJ+HbHDNTWZZAR6WkTFDEvq9SRJMz3ZW8U9FTlXz9+/Gd 7cxNBmAtaInzSSjN7JSYvVUSSe5rNrKxDFvtZgG5n1Oi3w31LCGt1xto+6in+dJzwJCe lcYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704884147; x=1705488947; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XovDo6g71dUW3xxSlFZ5p2kN6+6ojspuCXXtemQJf10=; b=PG7H91ceWUpua2V/36BA1vIMtdENN4zGMCGMuu9mZ+9Qe3zw49x7ZjxrC+vjvCoWmr TW9hC4/byIrvvNGeITZQRig/LHgmccGFZwbicLVqpimAXdVoSMkXmJJ1/BJo0h271Qah CE6Ulz7LDGSSpgX1iPYD04iHq1efQHyB74+EzC5NmV3cnmro6I4HH0kBt5d4G0oOLGJx o0Fmmcaz9SrH3S13pnAIdprDVy+zNiT9ob7tGAm8AqRcxix3gJWZWdGmK8z2rltrqVsJ caQ7oEvyAGyAMzhyJzE53Op+KRgmRygICJbbeCul31P9HPaULauPFVXoYrXTGAXRM3s4 8bAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyV5zLrna9qMmZrm73hvAhXKLDpZJ8FtrE/noTCBUxscjB726Vu T6VCd/t7UVjj8sdUpZ7bUbJbOzBSEyugQoomVqeorXoHR3pCrg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEd1AqxwxGdLm94IyI73PfJOK48J7QaBzT7SKGTGndUmAHxRQneQCtPTI9QE5aJOSdY1d+CIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:169a:b0:2cd:230c:cc40 with SMTP id bd26-20020a05651c169a00b002cd230ccc40mr404636ljb.42.1704884147334; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:55:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.30.205.119] (UNUSED.212-182-62-129.lubman.net.pl. [212.182.62.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y27-20020a05651c021b00b002cd77293ddcsm196596ljn.12.2024.01.10.02.55.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:55:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9daba002-2c49-49cf-a8e3-5b8350270df8@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:55:44 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Crypto Engine support for SM6350 Content-Language: en-US To: Luca Weiss , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Thara Gopinath , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bhupesh Sharma Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240105-sm6350-qce-v1-0-416e5c7319ac@fairphone.com> From: Konrad Dybcio In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/9/24 12:27, Luca Weiss wrote: > On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 1:40 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC. >>> >>> Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows >>> no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more. >> >> I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled >> a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug >> power while at it. > > Are you sure you mean QCE here (which this patch is about) and not ICE? I.. think I do. It's been a while. > > I'm not aware of them working together somehow but I wouldn't be > surprised if there's something since I don't know much of this area at > all. No idea Konrad