From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792735104; b=uOTwf4S7Qkmk7IDGmKera2UAbKSbE0Evss8TOVOTcqNVe8jLHGcNusZv09aTKihozP8D qXCmW2FozVjT0F+HBvZQ7yYt0zJTVg1+aWge4KQurBSXeDEx7pDa9w51CQQtdCMQA5f39 1t3nk5CbNYrnP/xa5PB3Srz3z3okHqTVm7E6ufGmDAdbJOlmTqSG3sb0PuNKoMl5RG3+1 HHom7XVtSM+XvCnJWZuf+dooi0pTsbMHAB5sLzYQam8Twud7qjw9MGjt+TXEMRSOXI6i9 iFrQszYt6kBN4Jo4F60Y3uxP5kV+Zd6b4l1aG7j2Wcd41lEbP2uurvbCsfsoqdlCrlg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792735104; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:X-CSE-ConnectionGUID:X-CSE-MsgGUID: X-IronPort-AV:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: X-CSE-MsgGUID:X-ExtLoop1:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Message-ID:Date: MIME-Version:User-Agent:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: Content-Language:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=R65EXrMvOWuGDp90Ia9xcp0VR60LBasxd5jtdZ6NYKI=; b=ftUAFVH4SpVaZYcOM/wpWGD8Rhf+hLzw/Q+eFT/jnUqTtmv3yZB4cMd5MeazYJN583UE MWy622RGUe/riurSZMEFIwNhjTtv+z1cH47Qo5KOmGgm6K7++G2m/zEey4Hb9NZbgZiY4 JoHiPaXZ4uVbYxkhVBS5Z5ucKpHrTryBRts/LFFyxXv0jnCUYkr2t+MmSDgInyBWGyotO 0SGBUJdZHdIoE5qWtBmVnhbJqXCPktz9z1qYfagLME0b4Nhyr1R0Y0GwT7CioNQsIg0Ra +R7U35NzOWIFhtINkyjWG8m9MaoxUrrGrycndgf0x3gn7IC9ljSSZsPbtJV9lKb2/Aw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b="TpbZ/h2K"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.19 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFDAC606A31A; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 05:58:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org DFDAC606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=TpbZ/h2K DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1792735104; x=1824271104; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MY2zCagseHT6AI4LZ4aKhSGYc5LnpUrcAqNbCjAsBJs=; b=TpbZ/h2KtjPStL0LG53fXn6zU9ehq+AxH+h4eg906hHReQxdGBMqjRbl pdsqRsJAhM/SdPMggqC9CGUnQVHxjFmgGOgjmb8MdPdso9hv2+8MvOewl 8aMpUoVsEnIDKjDXYY5vgaSLVkDUGUNe8yUCZH0eJeKQEuxC6s2pWMeVX IvoojxrINLroCjvvUEre7IPMEdyeH45fcZddxF8NpSQNdSyuSRLe79f+l FB8x67v7PBFa4+tWFsfv7okKsKS1eCBjXiTO0WDvxFBfNotdDdn56domd L4uhJLNZXnkbF1sNdCVc0vcoViy1r0eqWhHIB5tFUwd3ZThZVoiMo2Rr5 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FG3SC8K2SZmM8dPobH18ww== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DHIQ1ogESK2r6xMCJVYKFw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11943"; a="1598437" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,173,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="1598437" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2026 22:58:23 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: trPy+hzDTlWQ0bMQYawqrw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8fxvhsDWTJ66y6zIq8gJqg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,173,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="3591530" Received: from binbinwu-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.124.245.162]) ([10.124.245.162]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2026 22:58:17 -0700 Message-ID: <9dd75d43-883b-44fd-a68d-3c7916691dfa@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:58:15 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/28] x86/cea: Prefix event stack names with ESTACK_ To: Sohil Mehta , kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H . Peter Anvin" , Xin Li , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Cooper , Tom Lendacky , Nikunj A Dadhania , Shivansh Dhiman , David Woodhouse , Chao Gao , Zhao Liu , Yosry Ahmed , David Matlack , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <20260911213659.2025974-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> <20260911213659.2025974-5-sohil.mehta@intel.com> From: Binbin Wu Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260911213659.2025974-5-sohil.mehta@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/12/2026 5:36 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote: > From: "Xin Li (Intel)" > > Add the ESTACK_ prefix to event stack names to improve clarity and > readability. Without the prefix, names like DF, NMI, and DB are too > brief and potentially ambiguous. > > This renaming also prepares for converting __this_cpu_ist_top_va from > a macro into a function that accepts an enum exception_stack_ordering > argument, without requiring changes to existing callsites. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) > Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta > Acked-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu