From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964968AbWGHUNm (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:13:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964969AbWGHUNm (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:13:42 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:10630 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964968AbWGHUNl (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:13:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d2Zb9Qj2XWrw/4NanMg84+/OUsrPV42pVTIY/dLr+QefFfXHo1smotWvuws3xXvBIez+xgDyBUrSXDZpTnhErzHb8itOqDL/GVc2HwTjS3tFMu6UHSm72tr44WFvCwPjONjebwOCn760jCaz2+hDSYhF8oa7CD5qyK2Ra3Mh1u0= Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0607081313m1a1874cbs22de11961103f36b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 23:13:39 +0300 From: "Alon Bar-Lev" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson Cc: "Sunil Kumar" , "Arjan van de Ven" , "Bojan Smojver" , "Pavel Machek" , "Avuton Olrich" , "Olivier Galibert" , "Jan Rychter" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig , "Nigel Cunningham" In-Reply-To: <200607082158.49013.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <200607082125.12819.rjw@sisk.pl> <200607082158.49013.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, I'm not totally against that, at least as far as -mm is concerned, > but I meant "in the long run". Hello, The fact that you are against that does not cancel this option. There are three of them... But can you please explain why you against that? Alon.