From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>,
boris@bur.io, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: guard against missing private state in lock_delalloc_folios()
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 12:45:05 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e1bf022-730d-4b93-872a-259490eb4946@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260131013438.286422-1-inwardvessel@gmail.com>
在 2026/1/31 12:04, JP Kobryn 写道:
> Users of filemap_lock_folio() need to guard against the situation where
> release_folio() has been invoked during reclaim but the folio was
> ultimately not removed from the page cache. This patch covers one location
> which may have been overlooked.
>
> After acquiring the folio, use set_folio_extent_mapped() to ensure the
> folio private state is valid. This is especially important in the subpage
> case, where the private field is an allocated struct containing bitmap and
> lock data.
>
> Failing calls (with -ENOMEM) are treated as transient errors and execution
> will follow the existing "try again" path.
>
> Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 3df399dc8856..573b29f62bc1 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,18 @@ static noinline int lock_delalloc_folios(struct inode *inode,
> folio_unlock(folio);
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * release_folio() could have cleared the folio private data
> + * while we were not holding the lock.
> + * Reset the mapping if needed so subpage operations can access
> + * a valid private folio state.
> + */
> + if (set_folio_extent_mapped(folio)) {
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + goto out;
> + }
If the folio is released meaning it will not have dirty flag.
Then the above folio_test_dirty() should be triggered and exit with
-EAGAIN. We will re-search the extent io tree to re-grab a proper
delalloc range.
And if the folio is still dirty, it means it must still have private set.
Thus I'm afraid this check is a little over-killed.
Thanks,
Qu
> +
> range_start = max_t(u64, folio_pos(folio), start);
> range_len = min_t(u64, folio_next_pos(folio), end + 1) - range_start;
> btrfs_folio_set_lock(fs_info, folio, range_start, range_len);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-31 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-31 1:34 JP Kobryn
2026-01-31 2:15 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-01-31 18:53 ` JP Kobryn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e1bf022-730d-4b93-872a-259490eb4946@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®