mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7124: fix temperature channel
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:17:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e20ce95-a401-46ca-94aa-bd4488b45025@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <h2rof27omrhv4l6pjisdsnvkpb35ovy7e6m4soeltfun5rafk5@oriv7e3egh3p>

On 9/24/25 6:03 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello David,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 03:18:02PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Fix temperature channel not working due to gain and offset not being
>> initialized. This was causing the raw temperature readings to be always
>> 8388608 (0x800000).
>>
>> To fix it, we just make sure the gain and offset values are set to the
>> default values and still return early without doing an internal
>> calibration.
>>
>> While here, add a comment explaining why we don't bother calibrating
>> the temperature channel.
>>
>> Fixes: 47036a03a303 ("iio: adc: ad7124: Implement internal calibration at probe time")
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c | 11 +++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
>> index 374e39736584f55c1290db3e257dff2c60f884d2..94d90a63987c0f9886586db0c4bc1690855be2c1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c
>> @@ -1518,10 +1518,6 @@ static int __ad7124_calibrate_all(struct ad7124_state *st, struct iio_dev *indio
>>  	int ret, i;
>>  
>>  	for (i = 0; i < st->num_channels; i++) {
>> -
>> -		if (indio_dev->channels[i].type != IIO_VOLTAGE)
>> -			continue;
>> -
>>  		/*
>>  		 * For calibration the OFFSET register should hold its reset default
>>  		 * value. For the GAIN register there is no such requirement but
>> @@ -1531,6 +1527,13 @@ static int __ad7124_calibrate_all(struct ad7124_state *st, struct iio_dev *indio
>>  		st->channels[i].cfg.calibration_offset = 0x800000;
>>  		st->channels[i].cfg.calibration_gain = st->gain_default;
>>  
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Only the main voltage input channels are important enough
>> +		 * to be automatically calibrated here.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (indio_dev->channels[i].type != IIO_VOLTAGE)
>> +			continue;
>> +
> 
> I don't understand a detail of the problem. The commit log suggests that
> there is a general problem, but looking at the patch I suspect there is
> only a problem if at probe time the OFFSET and GAIN register for the
> temperature channel are different from their reset default setting.

What I failed to mention is that st->channels[i].cfg.calibration_offset
and st->channels[i].cfg.calibration_gain are zero-initialized. And that
these values are later programmed into the ADC. Programming these to
zero is what caused reading the raw value value to always return a fixed
value because the real value got multiplied by 0 in the ADC.

Is that enough to clear it up?

> 
> I think the patch is fine, but if my understanding is right the commit
> log is more dramatic than the issue really is, as it needs some fiddling
> with the ADC's registers between poweron and driver loading to trigger.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-24 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 20:18 David Lechner
2025-09-24 11:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-09-24 13:17   ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-09-24 14:33     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-09-24 13:01 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-09-24 13:22   ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e20ce95-a401-46ca-94aa-bd4488b45025@baylibre.com \
    --to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®