mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Remove atomics from test_loop to avoid test failures
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:14:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e3355e0-f0d6-5f82-d2f6-b7e84bda996c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231102162225.50028-1-nick.forrington@arm.com>



On 02/11/2023 16:22, Nick Forrington wrote:
> The current use of atomics can lead to test failures, as tests (such as
> tests/shell/record.sh) search for samples with "test_loop" as the
> top-most stack frame, but find frames related to the atomic operation
> (e.g. __aarch64_ldadd4_relax).
> 
> This change simply removes the "count" variable, as it is not necessary.
> 
> Fixes: 1962ab6f6e0b ("perf test workload thloop: Make count increments atomic")
> Signed-off-by: Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@arm.com>
> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c
> index af05269c2eb8..457b29f91c3e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
>   #include "../tests.h"
>   
>   static volatile sig_atomic_t done;
> -static volatile unsigned count;
>   
>   /* We want to check this symbol in perf report */
>   noinline void test_loop(void);
> @@ -19,8 +18,7 @@ static void sighandler(int sig __maybe_unused)
>   
>   noinline void test_loop(void)
>   {
> -	while (!done)
> -		__atomic_fetch_add(&count, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> +	while (!done);
>   }
>   
>   static void *thfunc(void *arg)

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-03  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02 16:22 Nick Forrington
2023-11-03  9:14 ` James Clark [this message]
2023-11-21 17:04   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-24 19:57 ` Michael Petlan
2023-11-25  3:05   ` Leo Yan
2023-11-25 19:10     ` Nick Forrington
2023-11-26  7:41       ` Leo Yan
2023-11-27 13:20         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-27 13:29           ` Leo Yan
2023-11-27 10:45   ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e3355e0-f0d6-5f82-d2f6-b7e84bda996c@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.forrington@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®