From: "zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<robert.moore@intel.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<pierre.gondois@arm.com>, <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
<ray.huang@amd.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
<mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
<ionela.voinescu@arm.com>, <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <treding@nvidia.com>,
<jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
<ksitaraman@nvidia.com>, <sanjayc@nvidia.com>,
<nhartman@nvidia.com>, <bbasu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when updating min/max_perf
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 21:56:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ea62a14-46a1-4238-97ed-aeabf9f3ab77@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223121307.711773-9-sumitg@nvidia.com>
On 2025/12/23 20:13, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> When min_perf or max_perf is updated via sysfs in autonomous mode, the
> policy frequency limits should also be updated to reflect the new
> performance bounds.
>
> Add @update_policy parameter to cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit() to
> control whether policy constraints are synced with HW registers.
> The policy is updated only when autonomous selection is enabled to
> keep SW limits in sync with HW.
>
> This ensures that scaling_min_freq and scaling_max_freq values remain
> consistent with the actual min/max_perf register values when operating
> in autonomous mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index 1f8825006940..0202c7b823e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -544,14 +544,20 @@ static void populate_efficiency_class(void)
> * cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit - Set min/max performance limit
> * @policy: cpufreq policy
> * @val: performance value to set
> + * @update_policy: whether to update policy constraints
> * @is_min: true for min_perf, false for max_perf
> + *
> + * When @update_policy is true, updates cpufreq policy frequency limits.
> + * @update_policy is false during cpu_init when policy isn't fully set up.
> */
> static int cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u64 val,
> - bool is_min)
> + bool update_policy, bool is_min)
> {
> struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
> struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps;
> unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
> + struct freq_qos_request *req;
> + unsigned int freq;
> u32 perf;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -571,15 +577,26 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u64 val,
> else
> cpu_data->perf_ctrls.max_perf = perf;
>
> + if (update_policy) {
> + freq = cppc_perf_to_khz(caps, perf);
> + req = is_min ? policy->min_freq_req : policy->max_freq_req;
> +
> + ret = freq_qos_update_request(req, freq);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to update %s_freq constraint for CPU%d: %d\n",
> + is_min ? "min" : "max", cpu, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
OK. Now I see the necessity of extracting this function. But why not use
freq_khz as a input parameter and convert it to perf in this funciton,
since you need the freq here?
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#define cppc_cpufreq_set_min_perf(policy, val) \
> - cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit(policy, val, true)
> -
> -#define cppc_cpufreq_set_max_perf(policy, val) \
> - cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit(policy, val, false)
> +#define cppc_cpufreq_set_min_perf(policy, val, update_policy) \
> + cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit(policy, val, update_policy, true)
>
> +#define cppc_cpufreq_set_max_perf(policy, val, update_policy) \
> + cppc_cpufreq_set_mperf_limit(policy, val, update_policy, false)
> static struct cppc_cpudata *cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;
> @@ -988,7 +1005,8 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
> perf = cppc_khz_to_perf(&cpu_data->perf_caps, freq_khz);
>
> guard(mutex)(&cppc_cpufreq_update_autosel_config_lock);
> - ret = cppc_cpufreq_set_min_perf(policy, perf);
> + ret = cppc_cpufreq_set_min_perf(policy, perf,
> + cpu_data->perf_ctrls.auto_sel);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1045,7 +1063,8 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
> perf = cppc_khz_to_perf(&cpu_data->perf_caps, freq_khz);
>
> guard(mutex)(&cppc_cpufreq_update_autosel_config_lock);
> - ret = cppc_cpufreq_set_max_perf(policy, perf);
> + ret = cppc_cpufreq_set_max_perf(policy, perf,
> + cpu_data->perf_ctrls.auto_sel);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-25 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 12:12 [PATCH v5 00/11] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/store Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 3:41 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:31 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ACPI: CPPC: Clean up cppc_perf_caps and cppc_perf_ctrls structs Sumit Gupta
2026-01-08 13:43 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 8:21 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:36 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ACPI: CPPC: Extend cppc_set_epp_perf() to support auto_sel and epp Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 3:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:39 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-16 15:59 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 9:03 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 12:06 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:38 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-15 8:01 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-24 18:32 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-26 0:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2026-01-08 14:30 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when updating min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 13:56 ` zhenglifeng (A) [this message]
2026-01-08 13:53 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-15 8:20 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when toggling auto_select Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 2:55 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:21 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-15 8:57 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] cpufreq: CPPC: make scaling_min/max_freq read-only when auto_sel enabled Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 3:26 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:01 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-08 16:46 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-09 14:37 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-12 11:44 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-15 12:32 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-15 15:22 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-16 17:05 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-15 15:15 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 8:03 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:04 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ea62a14-46a1-4238-97ed-aeabf9f3ab77@huawei.com \
--to=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nhartman@nvidia.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®