mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix sched_setparam() policy=-1 logic
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:27:41 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ebe0566a08dbbb3999759d3f20d6004bb2dbcfa.1406079891.git.bristot@redhat.com> (raw)

The scheduler uses policy=-1 to preserve the current policy state to
implement sched_setparam(). But, as (int) -1 is equals to 0xffffffff,
it's matching the if (policy & SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK) on
_sched_setscheduler(). This match changes the policy value to an
invalid value, breaking the sched_setparam() syscall.

This patch checks policy=-1 before check the SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK flag.

The following program shows the bug:

int main(void)
{
	struct sched_param param = {
		.sched_priority = 5,
	};

	sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
	param.sched_priority = 1;
	sched_setparam(0, &param);
	param.sched_priority = 0;
	sched_getparam(0, &param);
	if (param.sched_priority != 1)
		printf("failed priority setting (found %d instead of 1)\n",
			param.sched_priority);
	else
		printf("priority setting fine\n");
}

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.14+
Fixes: 7479f3c9cf67 "sched: Move SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK into attr::sched_flags"
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>

---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index bc1638b..0acf96b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3558,9 +3558,10 @@ static int _sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
 	};
 
 	/*
-	 * Fixup the legacy SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK hack
+	 * Fixup the legacy SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK hack, except if
+	 * the policy=-1 was passed by sched_setparam().
 	 */
-	if (policy & SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK) {
+	if ((policy != -1) && (policy & SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK)) {
 		attr.sched_flags |= SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK;
 		policy &= ~SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK;
 		attr.sched_policy = policy;
-- 
1.9.3


             reply	other threads:[~2014-07-23  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23  2:27 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [this message]
2014-07-23 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28  8:28 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix sched_setparam() policy == -1 logic tip-bot for Daniel Bristot de Oliveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ebe0566a08dbbb3999759d3f20d6004bb2dbcfa.1406079891.git.bristot@redhat.com \
    --to=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®