Re:Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Add vendor ID for Quectel and Cinterion

["Slark Xiao" <slark_xiao@163.com>]

At 2022-10-28 11:51:23, "Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:37:11AM +0800, Slark Xiao wrote:
>> In MHI driver, there are some companies product still do not have their
>>  own PCI vendor macro. So we add it here to make the code neat. Ref ID
>>  could be found in link https://pcisig.com/membership/member-companies
>>  and https://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids . Thales use Cinterion as
>> their IOT modem card's trademark. So you will find 0x1269 belongs to
>> Thales. Actually, Cinterion belongs to Gemalto, and Gemalto belongs to
>>  Thales.
>> 
>
>The patch description is confusing me.
>
>What about below instead?
>
>```
>Add missing vendor ID for Cinterion (which is 0x1269).
>```
>
As you said 0x1269 belongs to Thales (not Cinterion), So I write it about the details.

>> Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@163.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/pci_ids.h | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> index b362d90eb9b0..9e2b6286f53f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
>> @@ -1765,6 +1765,8 @@
>>  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_SATSAGEM		0x1267
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_SATSAGEM_NICCY	0x1016
>>  
>> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CINTERION		0x1269	/* Celluar Modules*/
>> +
>>  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ENSONIQ		0x1274
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENSONIQ_CT5880	0x5880
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENSONIQ_ES1370	0x5000
>> @@ -2585,6 +2587,8 @@
>>  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEKRAM		0x1de1
>>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TEKRAM_DC290	0xdc29
>>  
>> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_QUECTEL		0x1eac
>> +
>
>Why pourring in Quectel ID while this patch is about Cinterion?
>
>Thanks. 
>
Patch title is for 2 vendors,  Quectel and Cinterion. May I add 2 different VID at the 
same time?
>-- 
>An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara