From: Dan Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
To: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@google.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
michal.simek@amd.com, piyush.mehta@amd.com,
radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com, siva.durga.prasad.paladugu@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: uvc_video: unlock before submitting a request to ep
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:19:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ee4f736-e346-4b92-9a6d-8104d87132fc@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231108114848.794045-1-khtsai@google.com>
Hello
On 08/11/2023 11:48, Kuen-Han Tsai wrote:
> On 02/11/2023 07:11, Piyush Mehta wrote:
>> There could be chances where the usb_ep_queue() could fail and trigger
>> complete() handler with error status. In this case, if usb_ep_queue()
>> is called with lock held and the triggered complete() handler is waiting
>> for the same lock to be cleared could result in a deadlock situation and
>> could result in system hang. To aviod this scenerio, call usb_ep_queue()
>> with lock removed. This patch does the same.
> I would like to provide more background information on this problem.
>
> We met a deadlock issue on Android devices and the followings are stack traces.
>
> [35845.978435][T18021] Core - Debugging Information for Hardlockup core(8) - locked CPUs mask (0x100)
> [35845.978442][T18021] Call trace:
> [*][T18021] queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x84/0x388
> [35845.978451][T18021] uvc_video_complete+0x180/0x24c
> [35845.978458][T18021] usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x38/0x14c
> [35845.978464][T18021] dwc3_gadget_giveback+0xe4/0x218
> [35845.978469][T18021] dwc3_gadget_ep_cleanup_cancelled_requests+0xc8/0x108
> [35845.978474][T18021] __dwc3_gadget_kick_transfer+0x34c/0x368
> [35845.978479][T18021] __dwc3_gadget_start_isoc+0x13c/0x3b8
> [35845.978483][T18021] dwc3_gadget_ep_queue+0x150/0x2f0
> [35845.978488][T18021] usb_ep_queue+0x58/0x16c
> [35845.978493][T18021] uvcg_video_pump+0x22c/0x518
>
> As mentioned by Piyush, the uvcg_video_pump function acquires a spinlock before submitting the USB
> request to the endpoint, which will be processed by the dwc3 controller in our case.
>
> However, a deadlock can occur when the dwc3 controller fails to kick the transfer and decides to
> cancel and clean up all requests. At this point, the dwc3 driver calls the giveback function asking
> the corresponding driver to handle the cancellation. The uvcg_queue_cancel function then acquires
> the same spinlock to cancel the request, which results in a double acquirement and a deadlock.
Yep - I understand. I think the locking change looks fine, it's just the addition of the
usb_ep_set_halt() that doesn't seem necessary.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c
>> index 91af3b1ef0d4..0a5d9ac145e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c
>> @@ -460,11 +460,12 @@ static void uvcg_video_pump(struct work_struct *work)
>> req->no_interrupt = 1;
>> }
>>
>> - /* Queue the USB request */
>> - ret = uvcg_video_ep_queue(video, req);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->irqlock, flags);
>>
>> + /* Queue the USB request */
>> + ret = uvcg_video_ep_queue(video, req);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> + usb_ep_set_halt(video->ep);
>> uvcg_queue_cancel(queue, 0);
>> break;
>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-08 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 7:11 Piyush Mehta
2023-11-02 9:05 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2023-11-02 12:00 ` Dan Scally
2023-11-08 11:48 ` Kuen-Han Tsai
2023-11-08 14:19 ` Dan Scally [this message]
2023-11-16 9:28 ` Dan Scally
2023-11-17 1:45 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-11-17 3:28 ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-01-10 9:14 ` Pandey, Radhey Shyam
2024-01-11 1:21 ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-01-19 2:15 ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-01-29 10:08 ` Pandey, Radhey Shyam
2024-05-14 7:04 ` Pandey, Radhey Shyam
2024-05-17 2:42 ` Kuen-Han Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ee4f736-e346-4b92-9a6d-8104d87132fc@ideasonboard.com \
--to=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khtsai@google.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=piyush.mehta@amd.com \
--cc=radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com \
--cc=siva.durga.prasad.paladugu@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®