mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: swarren@nvidia.com, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
	alcooperx@gmail.com,
	"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH fixes v2] pinctrl: Really force states during suspend/resume
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:29:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f02caa1-638a-cb72-c87f-69e4282ae67d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170227230634.10688-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On 02/27/2017 03:06 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> In case a platform only defaults a "default" set of pins, but not a
> "sleep" set of pins, and this particular platform suspends and resumes
> in a way that the pin states are not preserved by the hardware, when we
> resume, we would call pinctrl_single_resume() -> pinctrl_force_default()
> -> pinctrl_select_state() and the first thing we do is check that the
> pins state is the same as before, and do nothing.
> 
> In order to fix this, decouple pinctrl_select_state and make it become
> pinctrl_commit_state(), taking an additional ignore_state_check boolean
> which allows us to bypass the state check during suspend/resume, since
> we really want to re-apply the previous pin states in these case.
> 
> Fixes: 6e5e959dde0d ("pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Linus, I have a better version of this coming where the p->state ==
state check is just moved into pinctrl_select_state() instead.
-- 
Florian

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-27 23:06 Florian Fainelli
2017-03-01 18:29 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f02caa1-638a-cb72-c87f-69e4282ae67d@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome