Re: [PATCH v1] doc: RCU: Fix typo

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 8/27/26 2:05 AM, Costa Shulyupin wrote:
> strategem -> stratagem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> index 8101fe6229d5..b10e0484ae13 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> @@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ periods:
>     corresponding CPU's next scheduling-clock.
>  #. CPUs mentioned in the ``nohz_full`` kernel boot parameter can run
>     indefinitely in the kernel without scheduling-clock interrupts, which
> -   defeats the above need_resched() strategem. RCU will therefore
> +   defeats the above need_resched() stratagem. RCU will therefore
>     invoke resched_cpu() on any ``nohz_full`` CPUs still holding out
>     after 109 milliseconds.
>  #. In kernels built with ``CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y``, if a given task that

-- 
~Randy