From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A046C04A68 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232450AbiG0Lo7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:44:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34072 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232415AbiG0Lo6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:44:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D544A814 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 04:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id v21so919947ljh.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 04:44:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jtn8/pXZqVmyVmHFD0ROY+AOvBnJkk+T5jet+Sm8Mvw=; b=dyptcIS3dLYiYzrlsmmZOGIFth86TvW5l6M+4b0Mr9yn3urso9iRQ8rrR+W6NJXyte 5wUp/Y9tUrZurvjY8+ZAJMb6OHPUFlDkKz7oyecCf62uJpXyr1ZO7ZLgLiNlHY5Fkt4R /dpHOcf947Ov7D8EhsepB/JwpSU8g3etAeE6vzsV1mrOSD8A1zEYB7bRuEr93FTaCZTY +y07iTbyKMJB1/WNq35+23UBJlm7NWtygCOAJUjsxXqzaABbVnr+IFMZJ4JoV0dlaR3b D+vLSZZKd+EsmqYaht1OLj05H+041oIkPOjblXPTeuAQ4lQPLzQjHGJ37ZNFf9kcQt+W 0TNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jtn8/pXZqVmyVmHFD0ROY+AOvBnJkk+T5jet+Sm8Mvw=; b=kTRHz1jYtbt84hbZgqvpvedtWVuxffaESiaUYngl1beZvjgRRMWJk5D9yJVfaZLAif ApGX5IqdLZ6C5LfKm4qg2CjKOJa4SqKAnmWzFMfT+otLr4MSw9zuuwdo+zpMkpGb7zn0 suTc5QDpOqqpTEgS1Oy+WmOFHW1m6al7Q796bQ3doOmn4eObgZMaGU3nJSusAjaVTDmo ou32K7DoH2lANtu1MZ94eG35D4LLgF7lwQUEoaX/ZUYAXDob+x1v3HOslPlqIBHn25fO EIdKONPswNl648t2qdLor6czJKGbH8DSGVRJSAlzOk937siSHXHbJNceMnQg4T+xzFy2 54Og== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+dw46IVLo9W2bbTNfqVMbSrMYxblnP9TGYidRZDy2KG+LBaKGW MTe6k4aiDFqorOxJkzRUsdI3kg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vKJFrPlmDXjA4BYKoOZrKRj/fRP1aoIdOTCo6UEZmXfLZ4iTyhVjD9Nptbds6dKOvZYwUDIg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9ada:0:b0:25e:1109:b067 with SMTP id p26-20020a2e9ada000000b0025e1109b067mr3243919ljj.425.1658922294916; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 04:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.197] (78-26-46-173.network.trollfjord.no. [78.26.46.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o5-20020ac24345000000b0047920d89606sm3745948lfl.187.2022.07.27.04.44.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 04:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9f32a4a9-66b4-ba2e-1713-436103c2faf8@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:44:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT binding documentation for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and SMARC EVK Content-Language: en-US To: "Lad, Prabhakar" Cc: Lad Prabhakar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Linux-Renesas , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-riscv , LKML , Biju Das References: <20220726180623.1668-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20220726180623.1668-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <636e9214-4b36-e9a6-3c6b-b6edb944335e@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/07/2022 13:37, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: >>>> >>> I did run the dtbs_check test as per your suggestion (below is the >>> log) and didn't see "no matching schema error" >>> >> >> So you do not see any errors at all. Then it does not work, does it? >> > Right I reverted my changes I can see it complaining, dtb_check seems > to have returned false positive in my case. > > What approach would you suggest to ignore the schema here? I don't think currently it would work with your approach. Instead, you should select here all SoCs which the schema should match. This leads to my previous concern - you use the same SoC compatible for two different architectures and different SoCs: ARMv8 and RISC-V. Best regards, Krzysztof