From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] nvme: use blk_mq_queue_tag_inflight_iter
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:45:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f3a574d-d2ea-3fd0-472c-85ad0bae4daf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190327023354.GB7389@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Keith
On 3/27/19 10:33 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:27:57AM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
>> As the comment above, the stable request maybe something that has been freed due to following case,
>> 1. a hctx->fq.flush_rq of dead request_queue that shares the same tagset
>> 2. a removed io scheduler's sched request
>> and this freed request could be allocated by others which may change the field of request->state.
>
> You're not explaing how that request->state is changed. I understand the
> request can be reallocated, but what is changing its state?
>
Sorry for my bad description, and lead to the misunderstand.
The _free_ below means,
1. a hctx->fq.flush_rq of dead request_queue that shares the same tagset
The whole request_queue is cleaned up and freed, so the hctx->fq.flush is freed back to a slab
2. a removed io scheduler's sched request
The io scheduled is detached and all of the structures are freed, including the pages where sched
requests locates.
So the pointers in tags->rqs[] may point to memory that is not used as a blk layer request.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-25 5:38 [PATCH V2 0/8]: blk-mq: use static_rqs to iterate busy tags Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] blk-mq: get rid of the synchronize_rcu in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] blk-mq: use static_rqs instead of rqs to iterate tags Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 7:12 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-03-25 7:14 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] blk-mq: use blk_mq_queue_tag_inflight_iter in debugfs Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] mtip32xx: use blk_mq_queue_tag_inflight_iter Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] nbd: " Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] skd: " Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] nvme: " Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 13:49 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-26 1:17 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-26 2:41 ` Ming Lei
2019-03-26 3:05 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-26 23:57 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 2:03 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-27 2:15 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 2:27 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-27 2:33 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 2:45 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2019-03-27 6:51 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 7:18 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-25 5:38 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-25 7:37 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-25 8:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-25 9:12 ` jianchao.wang
2019-03-26 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-25 5:28 [PATCH V2 0/8]: blk-mq: use static_rqs to iterate busy tags Jianchao Wang
2019-03-25 5:28 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] nvme: use blk_mq_queue_tag_inflight_iter Jianchao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f3a574d-d2ea-3fd0-472c-85ad0bae4daf@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome