mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Abhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: trenn@suse.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpupower : Handle set and info subcommands correctly
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:15:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f493ef7-8222-3e12-5068-41ea76e660a2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2614b112-5e19-96dc-179b-8d4e3b8c8858@kernel.org>

Hi Abhishek,

On 10/3/19 8:38 AM, shuah wrote:
> On 9/13/19 2:07 AM, Abhishek Goel wrote:
>> Cpupower tool has set and info options which are being used only by
>> x86 machines. This patch removes support for these two subcommands
>> from generic cpupower utility. Thus, these two subcommands will now be
>> available only for intel.
>> This removes the ambiguous error message while using set option in case
>> of using non-intel systems.
>>
>> Without this patch on a non-intel box:
>>
>> root@ubuntu:~# cpupower info
>> System does not support Intel's performance bias setting
>>
>> root@ubuntu:~# cpupower set -b 10
>> Error setting perf-bias value on CPU
>>
>> With this patch on a non-intel box:
>>
>> root@ubuntu:~# cpupower info
>> Supported commands are:
>>          frequency-info
>>          frequency-set
>>          idle-info
>>          idle-set
>>          monitor
>>          help
>>
>> Same result for set subcommand.
>>
>> This patch does not affect results on a intel box.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
>> ---
>>
>> changes from v1:
>>     Instead of bailing out early in set and info commands, in V2, we
>>     are cutting out support for these two commands for non-intel
>>     systems.
> 
> thanks. I will get this in for 5.4-rc3 veru likely. Definitely in 5.4
> 

Okay I almost applied this and decided it needs improvements.

I don't like using #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)

tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower.c main() already does this
dynamically using uname(). Please use the same logic do this,
instead of adding compile time code.

thanks,
-- Shuah

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13  8:07 Abhishek Goel
2019-10-03 14:38 ` shuah
2019-10-03 22:15   ` shuah [this message]
2019-10-14  9:38     ` Abhishek
2019-10-14 15:02       ` shuah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f493ef7-8222-3e12-5068-41ea76e660a2@kernel.org \
    --to=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®