mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Bartlomiej Dziag <bartlomiejdziag@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	"Daniel Machon" <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
	"Wojciech Drewek" <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Change the busy-wait loops timing
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 15:55:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f5f87d6-c7c2-4288-8c02-e57b0d943881@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606102100.12576-1-bartlomiejdziag@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Bartlomiej Dziag wrote:
> After writing a new value to the PTP_TAR or PTP_STSUR registers,
> the driver waits for the addend/adjust operations to complete.
> Sometimes, the first check operation fails, resulting in
> a 10 milliseconds busy-loop before performing the next check.
> Since updating the registers takes much less than 10 milliseconds,
> the kernel gets stuck unnecessarily. This may increase the CPU usage.
> Fix that with changing the busy-loop interval to 5 microseconds.
> The registers will be checked more often.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Dziag <bartlomiejdziag@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_hwtstamp.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_hwtstamp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_hwtstamp.c
> index e2840fa241f2..f8e1278a1837 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_hwtstamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_hwtstamp.c
> @@ -144,11 +144,11 @@ static int config_addend(void __iomem *ioaddr, u32 addend)
>  	writel(value, ioaddr + PTP_TCR);
>  
>  	/* wait for present addend update to complete */
> -	limit = 10;
> +	limit = 10000;
>  	while (limit--) {
>  		if (!(readl(ioaddr + PTP_TCR) & PTP_TCR_TSADDREG))
>  			break;
> -		mdelay(10);
> +		udelay(5);

I would actually suggest rewriting this using the macros from iopoll.h.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-06 10:19 Bartlomiej Dziag
2025-06-06 13:55 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2025-06-07 16:21 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f5f87d6-c7c2-4288-8c02-e57b0d943881@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bartlomiejdziag@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®