Re: [PATCH] drm: Don't BUG when a CRTC fence signals during a name lookup

["Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>]

On 10/20/26 08:57, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 20/10/2026 07:53, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> On Mon, 2026-10-19 at 16:17 +0000, redducc wrote:
>>> dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked() clears fence->ops on signalling when
>>> the ops have neither a release nor a wait callback, which is the case
>>> for drm_crtc_fence_ops.
>>>
>>> dma_fence_driver_name() and dma_fence_timeline_name() load fence->ops,
>>> check the signalled bit and then call into the ops. If the fence
>>> signals between that check and the call, fence_to_crtc() rereads
>>> fence->ops, finds NULL and hits the BUG_ON(). This takes down any
>>> caller of SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO on a CRTC out-fence, such as Android's
>>> surfaceflinger, which hit it on a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 phone (msm).
>>>
>>> The CRTC behind the fence outlives it, so reading the name after the
>>> ops were cleared is fine. Only warn when the fence carries foreign ops.
>>
>> @Christian:
>> We have now seen several bugs like these, which is one of the reasons
>> why I believe that RCU is the wrong solution for dma_fence.
>>
>> I present another rework RFC soonish.
>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 541c8f2468b9 ("dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v3")
>>> Assisted-by: LLM
>>> Signed-off-by: redducc <sushmit718@gmail.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
> 
> Hm this looked familiar so I looked around. There was an earlier fix for the same from Andre with msg-id 20260721-linux-drm_crtc_fix2-v3-2-afa8c71506e6@linaro.org which seems to have fallen through the cracks.

Yeah I was also wondering why that patch was never pushed.

I will take another look at this.

Regards,
Christian.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko
> 
>>
>>
>> The Signed tag btw. states that you have the legal right to push this
>> code upstream, and that you agree with the kernel's licensing. It's
>> uncommon to use with pseudonyms and lessens your personal accumulation
>> of prestige ;)
>>
>>
>> Philipp
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 +++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>>> index 63ead8ba6756..1dbd0e9db536 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,13 @@ static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_crtc_fence_ops;
>>>     static struct drm_crtc *fence_to_crtc(struct dma_fence *fence)
>>>   {
>>> -    BUG_ON(rcu_access_pointer(fence->ops) != &drm_crtc_fence_ops);
>>> +    const struct dma_fence_ops *ops = rcu_access_pointer(fence->ops);
>>> +
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * Signalling clears ops, and can race with a name lookup that already
>>> +     * picked our callbacks, so only a foreign ops pointer is a bug.
>>> +     */
>>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(ops && ops != &drm_crtc_fence_ops);
>>>       return container_of(fence->extern_lock, struct drm_crtc, fence_lock);
>>>   }
>>>  
>>> base-commit: 6a56f4f29711dd2da49f03a5b99ce53779e638d7
>