mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <bp@alien8.de>, <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/13] x86/apic: Construct a selector for the interrupt delivery mode
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:19:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f9f7477-01e9-cd16-47a2-e7ce13789e50@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170906101728.GM30906@x1>

Hi Baoquan

I am wordy one ah:
our target is checking if BIOS supports APIC, no matter what
type(separated/integrated) it is. if not, go to PIC mode.

Let‘s discuss the original logic and the smp_found_config,
then take about your code.

The existing logic is:

	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && !smp_found_config) ...(1)
		return -1;

	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) &&
	                APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) { ...(2)
		pr_err(....);

why smp_found_config has to be checked in (1)?

Because, In case of discrete (pretty old) apics we may not set
X86_FEATURE_APIC bit in cpuid, with 82489DX we can't rely on apic
feature bit retrieved via cpuid(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC)).[1]
So we assume that if SMP configuration is found from MP table
(smp_found_config = 1) in above case, there maybe a separated
chip in our pc.

After passing the check of (1), we in (2), check whether local APIC
is detected or not, If we have a BIOS bug.

[1] Commit 8312136fa8b0("x86, apic: Fix missed handling of discrete apics")

At 09/06/2017 06:17 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Dou,
>
> On 08/28/17 at 11:20am, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> +static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(void)
>> +{
>> +	/* Check kernel option */
>> +	if (disable_apic) {
>> +		pr_info("APIC disabled via kernel command line\n");
>> +		return APIC_PIC;
>> +	}
>> +
>
> I am not very familiar with cpu registers, not sure if we can adjust
> below code flow as:
>
> 	/* If APIC is integrated, check local APIC only */
> 	if (lapic_is_integrated() && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC)) {
> 		disable_apic = 1;
> 		pr_info("APIC disabled by BIOS\n");
> 		return APIC_PIC;
> 	}
>
> 	/* If APIC is on a separate chip, check if smp_found_config is found*/
> 	if (!lapic_is_integrated() && !smp_found_config) {
> 		disable_apic = 1;
> 		return APIC_PIC;
> 	}

Yes, Awesome, we first consider it from APIC register space, then
the BOIS and software configration. let me do more investigation.

I rewrite it based on you, any comments will welcome.

	/* If APIC is not integrated, check if SMP configuration is
	 * found from MP table. If not too, no 82489DX. switch to
	 * PIC mode
	 *
	 * Else APIC is integrated, check if the BIOS allows local APIC
	 *
	 */
	if (!lapic_is_integrated()) {
		if (!smp_found_config) {
			disable_apic = 1;
			return APIC_PIC;
		}
	} else if(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC)) {
			disable_apic = 1;
			pr_info("APIC disabled by BIOS\n");
			return APIC_PIC;
		}
	}

BTW, As the macro APIC_INTEGRATED(x) has already wrapped by
CONFIG_X86_32, I will cleanup the lapic_is_integrated() for readablity
like that:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index 7834f73..63b3ae9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -211,11 +211,7 @@ static inline int lapic_get_version(void)
   */
  static inline int lapic_is_integrated(void)
  {
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-       return 1;
-#else
         return APIC_INTEGRATED(lapic_get_version());
-#endif
  }


Do you think so. ;-)


Thanks,
	dou.


> 	~~~~ Now, I haven't think of why smp_found_config has to be
>              checked here.
>
> In this way, we don't need the CONFIG_X86_64 checking since it's
> contained in lapic_is_integrated() already. And the checking is obvious
> for understanding. Just not very sure if the checking is adequate.
>
> Just my personal opinion.
>
>> +	/* Check BIOS */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +	/* On 64-bit, the APIC must be integrated, Check local APIC only */
>> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC)) {
>> +		disable_apic = 1;
>> +		pr_info("APIC disabled by BIOS\n");
>> +		return APIC_PIC;
>> +	}
>> +#else
>> +	/*
>> +	 * On 32-bit, check whether there is a separate chip or integrated
>> +	 * APIC
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	/* Has a separate chip ? */
>> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && !smp_found_config) {
>> +		disable_apic = 1;
>> +
>> +		return APIC_PIC;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Has a local APIC ? */
>> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) &&
>> +		APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {
>> +		disable_apic = 1;
>> +		pr_err(FW_BUG "Local APIC %d not detected, force emulation\n",
>> +				       boot_cpu_physical_apicid);
>> +
>> +		return APIC_PIC;
>> +	}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	/* Check MP table or ACPI MADT configuration */
>> +	if (!smp_found_config) {
>> +		disable_ioapic_support();
>> +
>> +		if (!acpi_lapic)
>> +			pr_info("APIC: ACPI MADT or MP tables are not detected\n");
>> +
>> +		return APIC_VIRTUAL_WIRE;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return APIC_SYMMETRIC_IO;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * An initial setup of the virtual wire mode.
>>   */
>> --
>> 2.5.5
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-07  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-28  3:20 [PATCH v8 00/13] Unify the interrupt delivery mode and do its setup in advance Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] x86/apic: Construct a selector for the interrupt delivery mode Dou Liyang
2017-09-06  0:55   ` Baoquan He
2017-09-06  4:18     ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-06  9:02       ` Baoquan He
2017-09-06 10:17   ` Baoquan He
2017-09-07  4:19     ` Dou Liyang [this message]
2017-09-07  5:22       ` Baoquan He
2017-09-12  1:20         ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-12  8:04           ` Baoquan He
2017-09-13  2:30           ` Baoquan He
2017-09-13  3:48             ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] x86/apic: Prepare for unifying the interrupt delivery modes setup Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] x86/apic: Split local APIC timer setup from the APIC setup Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] x86/apic: Move logical APIC ID away from apic_bsp_setup() Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for SMP-capable system Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] x86/apic: Mark the apic_intr_mode extern for sanity check cleanup Dou Liyang
2017-09-06  4:25   ` Baoquan He
2017-09-06  5:26     ` Baoquan He
2017-09-06  5:41       ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-06  8:03         ` Baoquan He
2017-09-07  2:27           ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-07  2:34             ` Baoquan He
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for UP system Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] x86/ioapic: Refactor the delay logic in timer_irq_works() Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] x86/init: add intr_mode_init to x86_init_ops Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] x86/xen: Bypass intr mode setup in enlighten_pv system Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  4:25   ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2017-08-28  4:32     ` Juergen Gross
2017-08-28  5:15       ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] ACPI / init: Invoke early ACPI initialization earlier Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] x86/time: Initialize interrupt mode behind timer init Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  3:20 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] x86/apic: Remove the init_bsp_APIC() Dou Liyang
2017-08-28  5:38 ` [PATCH v8 00/13] Unify the interrupt delivery mode and do its setup in advance Dou Liyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f9f7477-01e9-cd16-47a2-e7ce13789e50@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®