mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhou, Yun" <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, pc@manguebit.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: fix ENOMEM handling in netfs_writepages() to drain all dirty folios
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:25:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fea3180-227b-4d85-9a60-16caee66be8d@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amGfmQHmZZuBkcwq@infradead.org>

On 7/23/26 12:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 01:25:55PM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
>> When netfs_create_write_req() fails with -ENOMEM in netfs_writepages(),
>> the couldnt_start error path redirties and unlocks the first folio,
> 
> writeback must use mempools to back resoures, or __GFP_NOFAIL if it
> can't for some reason.  -ENOMEM must not happend in writeback paths
> or your toast.  So please fix the cause of this error and not the
> symptoms.
> 

Thanks for the review. You're right - writeback should not fail with ENOMEM.

I'll follow your suggestion and use __GFP_NOFAIL for the allocation in 
the writeback path. The ENOMEM here comes from rolling_buffer_init() 
which uses plain GFP_NOFS for its folio_queue allocation.

Using mempools would be the more robust approach, but it requires adding 
a new mempool, modifying the rolling_buffer_init() signature and all its 
callers, plus the init/destroy lifecycle - a much larger change. 
__GFP_NOFAIL is a minimal fix that achieves the same goal for the 
writeback path.

Will send v2 shortly.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07  5:25 Yun Zhou
2026-07-07  6:13 ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-19 12:32 ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-22 14:04 ` Is writeback_iter() missing some error handling? -- was " David Howells
2026-07-23  3:43   ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-23 12:44   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-07-23  4:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23  7:25   ` Zhou, Yun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fea3180-227b-4d85-9a60-16caee66be8d@windriver.com \
    --to=yun.zhou@windriver.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome