Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Document glymur as compatible

[Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 1/23/2026 3:46 PM, Ananthu C V wrote:
> Add compatible for Qualcomm's glymur IMEM.

Shouldn't we use "mmio-sram" binding? Please note, starting from 
"kaanapali", IMEM is described as "mmio-sram". If we need to stick with 
this binding, please describe the same on why so?

>
> Signed-off-by: Ananthu C V <ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> V1->V2 alphabetically sorted the placement of glymur in the list
> ---
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
> index 6a627c57ae2f..5a4a2868388e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/qcom,imem.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
>       items:
>         - enum:
>             - qcom,apq8064-imem
> +          - qcom,glymur-imem
>             - qcom,ipq5424-imem
>             - qcom,msm8226-imem
>             - qcom,msm8974-imem