From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753792AbbINQEA (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:04:00 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.140]:52911 "EHLO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751816AbbINQD4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:03:56 -0400 From: Punit Agrawal To: Mark Rutland Cc: "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla , "linux-pm\@vger.kernel.org" , "lm-sensors\@lm-sensors.org" , Liviu Dudau , "edubezval\@gmail.com" , "linux\@roeck-us.net" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt\@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] Documentation: add DT bindings for ARM SCPI sensors References: <1442235619-4029-1-git-send-email-punit.agrawal@arm.com> <1442235619-4029-2-git-send-email-punit.agrawal@arm.com> <20150914131448.GC7002@leverpostej> <9hhh9mxf7lg.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150914134949.GE7002@leverpostej> <9hhk2rtdq1f.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150914144330.GH7002@leverpostej> <9hhfv2hdozu.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150914151540.GI7002@leverpostej> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:03:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150914151540.GI7002@leverpostej> (Mark Rutland's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:15:40 +0100") Message-ID: <9hh7fntdm4b.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Rutland writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:01:09PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> Mark Rutland writes: >> [...] >> >> After seeing the mapping already published, I am wondering if there is >> any value in duplicating the information. If there are no objections, >> I'll update this patch to add pointers instead. > > That's fine by me. The important part is that the value is a raw Sensor > ID as the FW uses. So long as we state that, the IDs themselves can come > from whatever documentation is valid for a particular instance. > > Thanks for the info! Sure. I've updated the patch to explain what the valid cell values are along with a pointer to platform documentation for Juno R0 and R1. I've also added an example to show usage of the sensors to create a thermal zone. I'll post a new version shortly. Thanks for your having a look. > > Thanks, > Mark. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html