From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269085AbUHYBUd (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:20:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269086AbUHYBUc (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:20:32 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:18063 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269085AbUHYBU2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:20:28 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: fraga@abusar.org ( =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E2niel?= Fraga) Subject: Suggestion: ESFQ and IMQ patches Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:16:57 -0300 Organization: http://www.turbonerd.hpg.ig.com.br Message-ID: <9t5tv1-ec2.ln1@tux.abusar.org> Reply-To: fraga@abusar.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 200-207-206-233.dsl.telesp.net.br X-Newsreader: knews 1.0c.0 X-Leafnode-Warning: administrator allowed illegal use of 8-bit data in header. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/ http://www.linuximq.net/ Is there any reason not to include ESFQ and IMQ in the 2.6 official kernel? Thanks. -- http://Processo.tk (1001 dias) http://U-br.tk Linux 2.6.7 São Paulo - SP