From: Eric Lee <eric.lee0305@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>,
Andrei Khomenkov <khomenkov@mailbox.org>,
Khushal Chitturi <khushalchitturi@gmail.com>,
Ethan Tidmore <ethantidmore06@gmail.com>,
Oskar Ray-Frayssinet <rayfraytech@gmail.com>,
SeungJu Cheon <suunj1331@gmail.com>,
Dalvin-Ehinoma Noah Aiguobas <fliegbert2@gmail.com>,
Jennifer Guo <guojy.bj@gmail.com>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric LI (Honggang)" <eric.lee0305@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor xmit_xmitframe
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 23:28:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A4EEF5A3-75CF-4A4B-98CB-2EDEE2223C81@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026100121-chirpy-stomp-9fbe@gregkh>
On Oct 1, 2026, at 5:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Refactor it how?
The previous code handled two cases in one branch
- pxmitbuf is null, or
- pxmitbuf is not null, but is not enough for current pframe.
That causes an additional check of pxmitbuf in that branch.
In my refactoring, I split them.
Firstly, handle the second case. In this case, pxmitbuf is either
enqueued on pending_xmitbuf_queue, or released. In either way,
pxmitbuf is not owning that xmitbuf anymore.
Next, handle the first case. In this case, a new xmitbuf is
allocated for the current pframe.
Setting pxmitbuf to NULL in the second case in order to make sure
allocating a new xmitbuf for the pframe.
On Oct 1, 2026, at 5:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> And is the output the same before/after?
The logic is not changed so the output are same.
On Oct 1, 2026, at 5:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > + pxmitbuf = NULL;
> This jumped out at me, why add this new line?
Two reasons to add this line:
1. pxmitbuf is not owning that xmitbuf anymore as it is either enqueued
on pending_xmitbuf_queue, or released.
2. a new xmitbuf is expected to be allocated for the current pframe.
So, it is safe to set pxmitbuf to NULL here, and it ensures
a new xmitbuf is allocated for the pframe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 15:16 Eric LI (Honggang)
2026-10-01 9:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-01 10:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-10-01 15:28 ` Eric Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A4EEF5A3-75CF-4A4B-98CB-2EDEE2223C81@gmail.com \
--to=eric.lee0305@gmail.com \
--cc=dennylin0707@gmail.com \
--cc=ethantidmore06@gmail.com \
--cc=fliegbert2@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guojy.bj@gmail.com \
--cc=khomenkov@mailbox.org \
--cc=khushalchitturi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rayfraytech@gmail.com \
--cc=suunj1331@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®