mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: check i_nlink while converting a file handle to dentry
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 08:41:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A5330653-F609-4CE7-BE15-AD80C671FAD2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170518164805.jgvxvvvseurrur7e@hermes.olymp>


> On 19 May 2017, at 00:48, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:36:44PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> 
>>> On 17 May 2017, at 19:21, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Converting a file handle to a dentry can be done call after the inode
>>> unlink.  This means that __fh_to_dentry() requires an extra check to
>>> verify the number of links is not 0.
>>> 
>>> The issue can be easily reproduced using xfstest generic/426, which does
>>> something like:
>>> 
>>> name_to_handle_at(&fh)
>>> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>>> unlink()
>>> open_by_handle_at(&fh)
>>> 
>>> The call to open_by_handle_at() should fail, as the file doesn't exist
>>> anymore.
>>> 
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Link: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19958
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ceph/export.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/export.c b/fs/ceph/export.c
>>> index e8f11fa565c5..7df550c13d7f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ceph/export.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/export.c
>>> @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static struct dentry *__fh_to_dentry(struct super_block *sb, u64 ino)
>>> 		ceph_mdsc_put_request(req);
>>> 		if (!inode)
>>> 			return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>>> +		if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
>>> +			iput(inode);
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>>> +		}
>>> 	}
>> 
>> maybe we should do this check in MDS
> 
> Thank you for your review.  Are you suggesting to do this check *only* in
> the MDS?  I guess that's probably a good thing to do too, but don't you
> think it's a good idea to keep it on the client side as well?

Applied. Thanks

Yan, Zheng

> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Luís

      reply	other threads:[~2017-05-19  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 11:21 Luis Henriques
2017-05-18 13:36 ` Yan, Zheng
2017-05-18 16:48   ` Luis Henriques
2017-05-19  0:41     ` Yan, Zheng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A5330653-F609-4CE7-BE15-AD80C671FAD2@redhat.com \
    --to=zyan@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®