mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [kpsingh:static_calls] [security] 9e15595ed0: Kernel_panic-not_syncing:lsm_static_call_init-Ran_out_of_static_slots
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:47:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A9568514-FCB3-4715-9794-696383B2B7E8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACYkzJ4G7hO0DNSBy4wpJG1PSgNkifuYcfOeTTpyVBtBtWvQSg@mail.gmail.com>



> On 15 Apr 2024, at 17:34, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 16:23, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:21 AM Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > On 2024/04/15 17:26, KP Singh wrote:
> > > This seems like an odd config which does not enable STATIC_CALL, I am going to
> > > make CONFIG_SECURITY depend on CONFIG_STATIC_CALL and make the dependency explicit.
> >
> > If CONFIG_SECURITY depends on CONFIG_STATIC_CALL, architectures which do not
> > support CONFIG_STATIC_CALL can no longer use LSM ? That sounds a bad dependency.
> 
> Agreed.  If the arch doesn't support static calls we need a fallback
> solution for the LSM that is no worse than what we have now, and
> preferably would still solve the issue of the BPF hooks active even
> where this is no BPF program attached.

Actually I take it back, when CONFIG_STATIC_CALL is not available, the implementation falls back to an indirect call. This crash is unrelated, I will debug further and post back.

- KP

> 
> -- 
> paul-moore.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-15 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15  5:30 kernel test robot
2024-04-15  8:26 ` KP Singh
2024-04-15 13:04   ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-04-15 14:23     ` Paul Moore
     [not found]       ` <CACYkzJ4G7hO0DNSBy4wpJG1PSgNkifuYcfOeTTpyVBtBtWvQSg@mail.gmail.com>
2024-04-15 15:47         ` KP Singh [this message]
2024-04-15 20:42           ` KP Singh
2024-04-15 20:54             ` Casey Schaufler
2024-04-15 21:39               ` KP Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A9568514-FCB3-4715-9794-696383B2B7E8@kernel.org \
    --to=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®