From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756109Ab1CAJjb (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 04:39:31 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:56968 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753517Ab1CAJj3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 04:39:29 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=g+ELuwE7FqVv0gh+/TQuDy23C8sVxzhN62C/JRr3phen7YQgsUuTfvXwtp/3AN3HHV gst17NZOJK7y0qMSDApA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1298877772.4937.25.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1298884559.2428.10083.camel@twins> <1298969141.4937.94.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:39:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -tip] perf: x86, add SandyBridge support From: Stephane Eranian To: Lin Ming Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Lin Ming wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 15:43 +0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 15:22 +0800, Lin Ming wrote: >>> >> This patch adds basic SandyBridge support, including hardware cache >>> >> events and PEBS events support. >>> >> >>> >> LLC-* hareware cache events don't work for now, it depends on the >>> >> offcore patches. >>> > >>> > What's the status of those, Stephane reported some problems last I >>> > remember? >>> > >>> I tried the trick I mentioned and it seems to work. >>> >>> Something like below with hwc->extra_alloc. >>> Could probably find a better name for that field. >> >> Stephane, >> >> I'll integrate below changes to the offcore patches, OK? >> > Let me try one more test on this. > I want to show the case the caused the problem in the first place. > There you go: $ task -e offcore_response_0:DMND_DATA_RD:local_dram -e offcore_response_0:DMND_DATA_RD:local_dram noploop 1 Here the two instances of offcore_response are in two different event groups. I instrumented get/put percore constraint routines. get1 is where you do the first allocation, get2 is where you do ref++. The scheduling algorithm will do: - submit 1st group - schedule 1st group - submit 2nd group - schedule 1st + 2nd group Which results in the following trace: [ 109.855713] CPU0 get1 cfg=1301b7 ref=1 [ 109.855717] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=2 [ 109.855718] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=3 <-- this one is bogus [ 109.856606] CPU0 put cfg=1301b7 ref=2 [ 109.856609] CPU0 put cfg=1301b7 ref=1 <- don't free the resource [ 109.856616] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=2 [ 109.856619] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=3 [ 109.856622] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=4 [ 110.742151] CPU0 put cfg=1301b7 ref=3 [ 110.742154] CPU0 put cfg=1301b7 ref=2 [ 110.742160] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=3 [ 110.742161] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=4 [ 110.742163] CPU0 get2 cfg=1301b7 ref=5 [ 110.854448] CPU0 put cfg=1301b7 ref=4 [ 110.854450] CPU0 put cfg=1301b7 ref=3