mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: config automatically switches from 32-bit to 64-bit for x86
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 22:49:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTiku0kPykE30DIQvOD9gauEGZbyeDWXGkLb53sgJ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529111951.GB31550@merkur.ravnborg.org>

Hello Sam and Américo,

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:37:00AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>> Hello Sam,
>>
>> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:49:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:37:36AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > I am trying to build 32 bit kernel image on 64-bit machine but after
>> >> > 'make menuconfig' it automatically switches 32-bit to 64-bit.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is this a BUG or did intentionally.
>> >>
>> >> I think it's intentional, but I'm really annoyed by this behaviour.
>> >
>> > The request when we did the merge of 32 and 64 bit was that we
>> > should continue to build 64bit kernels on 64 bit machines.
>> > And likewise for 32bit.
>> > Because this was what the users where used to.
>> >
>> > We could simplify metters by defining new rules.
>> > As you suggest that uname on an intel box always resulted in ARCH=x86.
>> > But then people would complain why a 32 bit kernel is default when
>> > the box is 64 bit.
>> >
>> > Something like this:
>> > [The escape chars align nicely in the patched Makefile]
>> >
>> >        Sam
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> > index ebc8225..e7f97a5 100644
>> > --- a/Makefile
>> > +++ b/Makefile
>> > @@ -161,10 +161,11 @@ export srctree objtree VPATH
>> >  # then ARCH is assigned, getting whatever value it gets normally, and
>> >  # SUBARCH is subsequently ignored.
>> >
>> > -SUBARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \
>> > -                                 -e s/arm.*/arm/ -e s/sa110/arm/ \
>> > +SUBARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/        \
>> > +                                 -e s/sun4u/sparc64/                    \
>> > +                                 -e s/arm.*/arm/ -e s/sa110/arm/        \
>> >                                  -e s/s390x/s390/ -e s/parisc64/parisc/ \
>> > -                                 -e s/ppc.*/powerpc/ -e s/mips.*/mips/ \
>> > +                                 -e s/ppc.*/powerpc/ -e s/mips.*/mips/  \
>> >                                  -e s/sh[234].*/sh/ )
>> >
>> >  # Cross compiling and selecting different set of gcc/bin-utils
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Thanks, this patch fixes the issue. Now 'make menuconfig' is following .config.
>
> If you think this is the right way to do things you can take it up
> with the x86 maintainers.
>
> Although the patch touches only a generic file this is x86 specific.
>

Américo Wang, Do you mind handle this kconfig patch.

Thanks,
--
Jaswinder Singh.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-29 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-27  0:07 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-05-27  0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-27  4:09   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-05-27  4:31     ` Américo Wang
2010-05-27  5:23       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-05-27  9:03         ` Américo Wang
2010-05-27  5:31       ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-27 16:19         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-05-27 20:21           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-27 15:19   ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2010-05-27 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-27 16:11   ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2010-05-27 16:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-27 16:35       ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2010-05-27 18:46   ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-05-27 22:07     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-05-29 11:19       ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-05-29 17:19         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2010-06-02  8:20           ` Américo Wang
2010-06-02  8:50             ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-06-03 13:30     ` Michal Marek
2010-06-04  6:23       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-06-04  7:53         ` Michal Marek
2010-06-06  4:14           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTiku0kPykE30DIQvOD9gauEGZbyeDWXGkLb53sgJ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®