From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752112Ab0IMNEi (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:04:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:46313 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751780Ab0IMNEg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:04:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=yGNnoIR04foZCaZnbJhv23P9BHiTMPCjB+bZnuMld7DQT+cOn85f0a/ir7ZYh+bUez Sq35dIdEp5zFx8zelGUADvA3tSxRTsPNlRTYkDc7ZKq7hizso/48VFXBIDrPvhC526XL XnITzrMlHg0i6tVQ65Y57AbVOORMh5Cxz2CIY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1284054125.2762.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1282932708.1946.8.camel@work-vm> <1284054125.2762.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:04:36 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nzrSRMMEzYExE71H0SrlLVuHgi8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: System time drifts when processor idle. From: jean-philippe francois To: john stultz Cc: Lin Ming , venki@google.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , jslaby@suse.cz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2010/9/9 john stultz : > On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:23 +0200, jean-philippe francois wrote: >> 2010/8/27 john stultz : >> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:12 +0200, jean-philippe francois wrote: >> >> My Timekeeping bug is still present, here is an updated script and log. >> >> I am willing to make test, but I don't know what kind of debugging >> >> info is needed. >> >> >> >> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource >> >> hpet acpi_pm >> >> cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource >> >> hpet >> > >> > Huh. hpet was not what I would have expected. >> > >> > >> > So first, two experiments: >> > >> > 1) Does booting with "clock=acpi_pm" cause the issue to disappear? >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> The same bug happens with clock=acpi_pm. >> My apologies for a previous mail where I said it was not hapenning with acpi_pm. >> >> With both clock, the timekeeping gap augments by amount of 5 minutes. > > Huh. So this still seems strange, but assuming we're still using the > hpet for irqs, its possible the event somehow gets pushed back 5 minutes > and we miss an timekeeping interval accumulation (with acpi_pm, the > counter wraps ever 5 seconds or so, so we could miss many accumulation > intervals and still be 5 minutes off if the tick timer was late). > > Again, seeing if the issue goes away with nohz=off would be helpful. > It goes away witj nohz=off Thank you for your interest. Jean-Philippe François