From: trapDoor <trapdoor6@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, trapDoor <trapdoor6@googlemail.com>
Subject: [REGRESSION, bisected] 2.6.36-rc1 - suspend issues
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:01:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimnC384BMdwJtk1Rp33YnAXr66HJqPvBegOxGmC@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
The merge window is closed so it's time to hunt for bugs. I've got
one, please find details below.
-----------------------
Working kernels: from 2.6.35 - to 2.6.35.2
Non working kernels: from (at least) 2.6.35-git2 - to 2.6.36-rc1
-----------------------
Description of the problem(s):
1. First of all I confirm that the problem is consistent: suspend
works well every time on the 'good' kernels and it newer works (with
the symptoms) on any of the 'bad' kernels. I've tested it several
times on a couple of 'good' and 'bad' kernels to make sure it's not
some random issue.
2. On a bad kernel, this is what happens when I try to switch to suspend mode:
- screen goes blank ['No signal detected !'] - that's OK :)
- either the CPU fan or PSU fan or both are still running and they
won't stop (left it for about 30 min. once)
- the power light is on and still, where in suspend mode it should
blink - that won't change either
- pressing the power button obviously doesn't wake the system up; need
to hard reboot
3. Now, when booting again, after an unsuccessful suspend and hard
reboot, something happens to my network card (and it doesn't matter
what is the next kernel I boot from - it can be any 'good' or 'bad'
one):
- in Gnome, the gnome-panel network indicator shows my connection as
disabled (wired eth0 - the only one I use); enabling it doesn't bring
my network up
4. After re-booting from any of the 'good' or 'bad' kernels my network
connection is working again.
-----------------------
Bisecting turned up the following commit. Reverting it in 2.6.36-rc1
results in a system that works.
commit bd25f4dd6972755579d0ea50d1a5ace2e9b00d1a
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun Jul 11 15:34:05 2010 +0200
HID: hiddev: use usb_find_interface, get rid of BKL
This removes the private hiddev_table in the usbhid
driver and changes it to use usb_find_interface
instead.
The advantage is that we can avoid the race between
usb_register_dev and usb_open and no longer need the
big kernel lock.
This doesn't introduce race condition -- the intf pointer could be
invalidated only in hiddev_disconnect() through usb_deregister_dev(),
but that will block on minor_rwsem and not actually remove the device
until usb_open().
-----------------------
Despite mentioned issues with network (occurring every time after
unsuccessful suspend > hard restart) the bisecting turned up a commit
which isn't rather related to network. But I can confirm that
reverting only this one commit in 2.6.36-rc1
[da5cabf80e2433131bf0ed8993abc0f7ea618c73] fixes the whole problem -
suspend works OK and I have no issues with my network after waking the
system up, neither after re-booting from the same or any other kernel.
Please let me know what further details should I provide. Any logs,
hardware specifications? I've also made a brief log recording the
bisect if anyone would need it.
--
Regards
Tomasz B. aka trapDoor
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 17:01 trapDoor [this message]
2010-08-17 19:27 ` trapDoor
2010-08-17 20:54 ` Andrea Gelmini
2010-08-17 21:48 ` trapDoor
2010-08-18 1:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-18 1:56 ` trapDoor
2010-08-18 7:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2010-08-18 8:43 ` trapDoor
2010-08-18 8:46 ` Jiri Kosina
2010-08-18 9:13 ` trapDoor
2010-08-18 9:33 ` Andrea Gelmini
2010-08-18 13:30 ` Andrea Gelmini
2010-08-18 14:48 ` Gabriel Craciunescu
2010-08-19 7:40 ` Jiri Kosina
2010-08-19 19:23 ` trapDoor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimnC384BMdwJtk1Rp33YnAXr66HJqPvBegOxGmC@mail.gmail.com \
--to=trapdoor6@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trapdoor6@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®