From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755801Ab1ANJrH (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:47:07 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:38203 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417Ab1ANJrB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:47:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZLNUP5Ez5cxCLiMMJ3/nC8ZEsGKde/ZGj442upDSBcyGKHe4X3G2kwnhfEBQSBCB1b UsWkfVhONC328vey3ZQ4Ebq3gjhhZqFGq4P2phRx8B+wtSkp9pLcajw7x+s+95aqL5OY TEKNg0VEyqb8mhzubcnDVipFHhpHhCJ9nkyuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <8952.1294927845@jrobl> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:47:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Work around NFS wreckage From: Sedat Dilek To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Nick Piggin , "J. R. Okajima" , Nick Piggin , LKML , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, "Ramirez Luna, Omar" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Nick Piggin wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, J. R. Okajima wrote: >> >> Thomas Gleixner: >> >> > The dcache scalability work broke NFS root filesystems. >> >>       ::: >> >> > Check for parent equal dentry and skip the nested lock to avoid the >> >> > deadlock. I'm sure this is the wrong fix, but at least it "works" :) >> >> >> >> With this patch, can you unmount it cleanly? >> >> It skips incrementing d_count for both dentries. >> >> Do we need at least one? >> > >> >> Yeah thanks everyone for reporting this. >> >> I have a fix for it in a slightly different way, and a couple of other reported >> bugs, which are going through stress testing now. > > Can you point us to the patches, so we can run our own set of > tests in paralell? > > Thanks, > >        tglx I guess several mentionned patches are now in [1] and I am testing them against linux-next (next-20110114). - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/npiggin/linux-npiggin.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/vfs-scale-working