mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>
To: <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Robert de Rooy" <robert.de.rooy@gmail.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@redhat.com>, "Tejun Heo" <htejun@gmail.com>,
	<linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@garzik.org>,
	"Gregor Jasny" <gjasny@googlemail.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	<sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Mikael Pettersson" <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Subject: RE: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:24:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AE4F746F2AECFC4DA4AADD66A1DFEF01A55540@otce2k301.adaptec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070601175344.GA13721@in.ibm.com>

Agree, but overstated somewhat.

The card in question that the regression is reported against is not a
released card and as such could have a flawed environment, Hardware,
Firmware or other Incompatibility. The fix for the root cause will
likely not touch the driver or the kernel.

It does raise the specter of a possible follow-on patch to address the
root cause under kdump should we determine that the problem can not be
solved in time of release of the Firmware of the current pre-released
card or if we discover that other released cards have a similar Firmware
or Hardware bug. Speculation such as these do not belong on kernel
regression reports IMHO.

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgoyal@in.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:54 PM
> To: Andrew Morton
> Cc: Michal Piotrowski; Linus Torvalds; LKML; 
> linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org; Robert de Rooy; Alan Cox; 
> Tejun Heo; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Jeff Garzik; Gregor 
> Jasny; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; James Bottomley; AACRAID; 
> Yinghai Lu; Vivek Goyal; sparclinux@vger.kernel.org; David 
> Miller; Mikael Pettersson
> Subject: Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:01:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:20:55 +0200 Michal Piotrowski 
> <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > SCSI
> > > 
> > > Subject    : aacraid: adapter kernel panic'd fffffffd (kexec)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/29/491
> > > Submitter  : Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> > > Handled-By : Salyzyn, Mark <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>
> > >              Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
> > > Status     : problem is being debugged
> > 
> > Mark's 
> aacraid-fix-shutdown-handler-to-also-disable-interrupts.patch is
> > known to fix this, so we can move this to "known 
> regressions with patches"
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> aacraid-fix-shutdown-handler-to-also-disable-interrupts.patch is meant
> to ensure that we don't perform an unnecessary reset of the device
> during a kexec boot. During kexec, we perform the device_shutdown()
> which should bring the device to a known sane state and a reset is
> not required while next kernel is coming up.
> 
> I think this fix just masks Yinghai's problem and as such does not
> fix the root cause of the problem. In his case a software reset
> of the card is not successful and this is a problem. This problem
> will become visible during kdump.
> 
> So I would think that this regression is still there just that got
> shifted from kexec to kdump.
> 
> But we do need above patch to make sure kexec boot is fast and does
> not perform any unrequired device reset.
> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-01 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <465FED20.3090206@googlemail.com>
2007-06-01 12:20 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-01 16:01   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 17:53     ` Vivek Goyal
2007-06-01 18:24       ` Salyzyn, Mark [this message]
2007-06-01 19:54         ` Yinghai Lu
2007-06-01 12:21 ` [3/3] " Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-01 14:23   ` [3/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2 (suspend, fw-ohci) Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AE4F746F2AECFC4DA4AADD66A1DFEF01A55540@otce2k301.adaptec.com \
    --to=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gjasny@googlemail.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=robert.de.rooy@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®