mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
	"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Define the scope of the initial xstate data
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:53:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AF6E884F-F6DC-4519-B57E-F6CFBDBEF85B@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208123330.GE17908@zn.tnic>

On Feb 8, 2021, at 04:33, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 07:57:04AM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> init_fpstate is used to record the initial xstate value for convenience
> 
> convenience?

Yes, this is vague. I think the usage is when (re-)initializing the register
states, e.g. from fpu__clear().

Maybe, drop ‘for convenience’ from this sentence, since the buffer’s usage is
not much relevant in this changelog.

>> and covers all the states. But it is wasteful to cover large states all
>> with trivial initial data.
>> 
>> Limit init_fpstate by clarifying its size and coverage, which are all but
>> dynamic user states. The dynamic states are assumed to be large but having
>> initial data with zeros.
>> 
>> No functional change until the kernel supports dynamic user states.
> 
> What does that mean?
> 
> This patch either makes no functional change or it does...

It does functional change, but it is conditional to AMX enabling.

It includes all the initial states when AMX states not enabled. But it will
exclude the AMX state (with 8KB zeros) with the change.

>> extern union fpregs_state init_fpstate;
>> 
>> +static inline u64 get_init_fpstate_mask(void)
>> +{
>> +	/* init_fpstate covers states in fpu->state. */
>> +	return (xfeatures_mask_all & ~xfeatures_mask_user_dynamic);
>> +}
> 
> If you're going to introduce such a helper, then use it everywhere in the code:
> 
> $ git grep "xfeatures_mask_all & ~xfeatures_mask_user_dynamic"
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:239: dst_fpu->state_mask = xfeatures_mask_all & ~xfeatures_mask_user_dynamic;
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:148:       else if (mask == (xfeatures_mask_all & ~xfeatures_mask_user_dynamic))
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:932:       current->thread.fpu.state_mask = (xfeatures_mask_all & ~xfeatures_mask_user_dynamic);
> 
> and if you do that, do that in a separate pre-patch which does only this
> conversion.

I think they are in a different context.

The helper indicates the mask for the ‘init_fpstate’ buffer. The rest is the
initial mask value for the per-task xstate buffer.

Since you suggested to introduce get_xstate_buffer_attr(), how about replacing
what you found with something like:

get_xstate_buffer_attr(XSTATE_INIT_MASK)

>> +
>> extern void fpstate_init(struct fpu *fpu);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
>> extern void fpstate_init_soft(struct swregs_state *soft);
>> @@ -269,12 +281,12 @@ static inline void copy_fxregs_to_kernel(struct fpu *fpu)
>> 		     : "memory")
>> 
>> /*
>> - * This function is called only during boot time when x86 caps are not set
>> - * up and alternative can not be used yet.
>> + * Use this function to dump the initial state, only during boot time when x86
>> + * caps not set up and alternative not available yet.
>>  */
> 
> What's the point of this change? Also, "dump"?!

Yeah, right now, I don’t see the change is really necessary here. Sorry.

>> -	memset(state, 0, fpu_kernel_xstate_min_size);
>> +	memset(state, 0, fpu ? get_xstate_size(fpu->state_mask) : get_init_fpstate_size());
>> 
>> 	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
>> -		fpstate_init_xstate(&state->xsave, xfeatures_mask_all);
>> +		fpstate_init_xstate(&state->xsave, fpu ? fpu->state_mask : get_init_fpstate_mask());
> 
> <---- newline here.

Okay. Will do that.

Thanks,
Chang

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-08 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 15:56 [PATCH v3 00/21] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify initialization helper to handle both static and dynamic buffers Chang S. Bae
2021-01-15 12:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify state copy helpers " Chang S. Bae
2021-01-15 12:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-19 18:50     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-20 20:53       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-20 21:12         ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify address finders " Chang S. Bae
2021-01-15 13:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify context switch helpers " Chang S. Bae
2021-01-15 13:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-19 18:49     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Add a new variable to indicate dynamic user states Chang S. Bae
2021-01-15 13:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-15 19:47     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-19 15:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-19 18:57         ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-22 10:56           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-27  1:23             ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Calculate and remember dynamic xstate buffer sizes Chang S. Bae
2021-01-22 11:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-27  1:23     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-27  9:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-03  2:54         ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce helpers to manage dynamic xstate buffers Chang S. Bae
2021-01-26 20:17   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-27  1:23     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-27 10:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-03  4:10         ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-02-04 13:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-03  4:10     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Define the scope of the initial xstate data Chang S. Bae
2021-02-08 12:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 18:53     ` Bae, Chang Seok [this message]
2021-02-09 12:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 15:38         ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce wrapper functions to organize xstate buffer access Chang S. Bae
2021-02-08 12:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 15:50     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate save function to support dynamic xstate Chang S. Bae
2021-01-07  8:41   ` Liu, Jing2
2021-01-07 18:40     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-12  2:52       ` Liu, Jing2
2021-01-15  4:59         ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-15  5:45           ` Liu, Jing2
2021-02-08 12:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 15:48     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate buffer address finder " Chang S. Bae
2021-02-19 15:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-19 19:19     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate context copy function to support dynamic buffer Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand dynamic context switch buffer on first use Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Support ptracer-induced xstate buffer expansion Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Extend the table to map xstate components with features Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] x86/cpufeatures/amx: Enumerate Advanced Matrix Extension (AMX) feature bits Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] x86/fpu/amx: Define AMX state components and have it used for boot-time checks Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] selftest/x86/amx: Include test cases for the AMX state management Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic user state in the signal handling path Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters to control some state component support Chang S. Bae
2020-12-23 18:37   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-14 21:31     ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-14 21:31 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions Bae, Chang Seok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AF6E884F-F6DC-4519-B57E-F6CFBDBEF85B@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®