From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Security Officers <security@kernel.org>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: insist on the plain-text requirement for security reports
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 06:40:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AFC0A4BB-6DBB-4C66-A2DF-940F9B6725A5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251129141741.19046-1-w@1wt.eu>
On November 29, 2025 6:17:41 AM PST, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>As the trend of AI-generated reports is growing, the trend of unreadable
>reports in gimmicky formats is following, and we cannot request that
>developers rely on online viewers to be able to read a security report
>full for formatting tags. Let's just insist on the plain text requirement
>a bit more.
>
>Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
>---
> Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst b/Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst
>index 84657e7d2e5b..c0cf93e11565 100644
>--- a/Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst
>+++ b/Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst
>@@ -33,12 +33,16 @@ that can speed up the process considerably. It is possible that the
> security team will bring in extra help from area maintainers to
> understand and fix the security vulnerability.
>
>-Please send plain text emails without attachments where possible.
>+Please send **plain text** emails without attachments where possible.
> It is much harder to have a context-quoted discussion about a complex
> issue if all the details are hidden away in attachments. Think of it like a
> :doc:`regular patch submission <../process/submitting-patches>`
> (even if you don't have a patch yet): describe the problem and impact, list
> reproduction steps, and follow it with a proposed fix, all in plain text.
>+Markdown, HTML and RST formatted reports are particularly frowned upon since
>+they're quite hard to read for humans and encourage to use dedicated viewers,
>+sometimes online, which by definition is not acceptable for a confidential
>+security report.
HTML sure. But why discourage .md and .rst? Markdown is pretty well the defacto "human readable" markup format and our own kernel documentation is .rst. Those are good for seeing code snippets, etc.
I would call out PDF and ZIP instead. We especially don't want _binary_ formats.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-29 14:17 Willy Tarreau
2025-12-01 6:38 ` Greg KH
2025-12-01 7:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-12-22 22:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-12-01 20:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-03 7:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-12-03 14:40 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-12-03 14:58 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AFC0A4BB-6DBB-4C66-A2DF-940F9B6725A5@kernel.org \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®