RE: [PATCH] ftrace: As disabling interrupts is costly and write_lock variant of tasklist_lock is not held from interrupt context it is not necessary to disable interrupts.

["N, Soumya P" <soumya.p.n@hpe.com>]

Hi Steve,

Could you please explain what this error means?
Is it related to length of subject?
I have run checkpatch.pl on patch and didn't show any error.

Thanks,
Soumya.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@goodmis.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 1:25 AM
To: N, Soumya P <soumya.p.n@hpe.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: As disabling interrupts is costly and write_lock variant of tasklist_lock is not held from interrupt context it is not necessary to disable interrupts.


-ERUNONSUBJECT

-- Steve


On Tue, 17 May 2016 21:31:14 +0530
Soumya PN <soumya.p.n@hpe.com> wrote:

> In ftrace.c inside the function alloc_retstack_tasklist()(which will 
> be invoked when function_graph tracing is on) the tasklist_lock is 
> being held as reader while iterating through list of threads. Here the 
> lock is being held as reader with irqs disabled. The tasklist_lock is 
> never write_locked in interrupt context so it is safe to not disable 
> interrupts for the duration of read_lock in this block which, can be 
> significant, given the block of code iterates through all threads. 
> Hence changing the code to call read_lock() and read_unlock() instead 
> of read_lock_irqsave() and read_unlock_irqrestore(). Seen the same 
> change is made in "kernel/tracepoint.c" and "kernel/sched/core.c"files 
> with commit ids 'commit 8063e41d2ffc ("tracing: Change 
> syscall_*regfunc() to check PF_KTHREAD and use for_each_process_thread()")'
> 'commit 3472eaa1f12e ("sched: normalize_rt_tasks(): Don't use _irqsave 
> for tasklist_lock, use task_rq_lock()")'
> 
> Stopped the irqbalance service and bound the interrupts and processes 
> being traced to the same cpu core with function_graph tracing on. I/Os 
> completed successfully. Verified the trace output and seen the 
> expected results.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Soumya PN <soumya.p.n@hpe.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c index 
> b1870fb..a680482 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -5713,7 +5713,6 @@ static int alloc_retstack_tasklist(struct 
> ftrace_ret_stack **ret_stack_list)  {
>  	int i;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	int start = 0, end = FTRACE_RETSTACK_ALLOC_SIZE;
>  	struct task_struct *g, *t;
>  
> @@ -5729,7 +5728,7 @@ static int alloc_retstack_tasklist(struct ftrace_ret_stack **ret_stack_list)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	read_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  	do_each_thread(g, t) {
>  		if (start == end) {
>  			ret = -EAGAIN;
> @@ -5747,7 +5746,7 @@ static int alloc_retstack_tasklist(struct ftrace_ret_stack **ret_stack_list)
>  	} while_each_thread(g, t);
>  
>  unlock:
> -	read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  free:
>  	for (i = start; i < end; i++)
>  		kfree(ret_stack_list[i]);