From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751924AbcEUSpf (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2016 14:45:35 -0400 Received: from mail-bn1bbn0105.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.105]:36192 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379AbcEUSpa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2016 14:45:30 -0400 From: "N, Soumya P" To: Steven Rostedt CC: "mingo@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] ftrace: As disabling interrupts is costly and write_lock variant of tasklist_lock is not held from interrupt context it is not necessary to disable interrupts. Thread-Topic: [PATCH] ftrace: As disabling interrupts is costly and write_lock variant of tasklist_lock is not held from interrupt context it is not necessary to disable interrupts. Thread-Index: AQHRsBpgsSb/EMl5gk2arryxuHY0rp+/Hf2AgADY5aCAAEiTAIAACffQgAHOJACAAaPwwA== Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 18:30:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1463500874-77480-1-git-send-email-soumya.p.n@hpe.com> <20160518155433.1631bb23@gandalf.local.home> <20160519091036.44e14667@gandalf.local.home> <20160520132020.371e076a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20160520132020.371e076a@gandalf.local.home> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: goodmis.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;goodmis.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hpe.com; x-originating-ip: [116.75.98.56] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b7fea7e2-35a9-437c-4fea-08d381a5f2f5 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;AT5PR84MB0035;5:rq3cpzX1r+cDOb1uRkgLBghORV4FSkyudxcpUtGNnRkvdguBg7mzLKXvvBhU/mmsuO7nKxNkIRjrCy76FVNGG0ZC/Ktj7/XynYdcjjOCfFfTA+sxxVSXoIRxKvOTU6nzCgxAY6yW6tIAwD0MuzsQ1g==;24:sUhZWkbcgI5sPJOWAL5EOYEVkzeFpi3gn3eD1f44Lp28WeZGs+7HOTJV29G9A4BZcbfZwDt/6KRLLfKnubL3Qef1dLGhoXLYxHcTx/Y49pk=;7:Ih9nqe+61Fr+X4zt6DU+aWSKVtLIZTN6pqhwcy74xTI+CFjZRW5cvm6Cd3KDdVmz9nkPnUh9cQZF7V2zGnnZr0sw5eTJbt0SM//MHFpQ6uXU4EcxKRuAC9gAoJNzpb0LKfUrhgaPLAH5WiOQ057fKpVhFrqtRQiR6Sr4LLEDj/z/TOkQ0Tiz4z8bJSLQUCBi x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AT5PR84MB0035; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046);SRVR:AT5PR84MB0035;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AT5PR84MB0035; x-forefront-prvs: 09497C15EB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(43544003)(54534003)(24454002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(122556002)(5003600100002)(92566002)(81166006)(6116002)(102836003)(586003)(1220700001)(10400500002)(87936001)(8936002)(5008740100001)(93886004)(3846002)(50986999)(3280700002)(99286002)(3660700001)(106116001)(189998001)(4326007)(110136002)(77096005)(76176999)(8676002)(2950100001)(2900100001)(66066001)(54356999)(33656002)(86362001)(5004730100002)(9686002)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(2906002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:AT5PR84MB0035;H:AT5PR84MB0036.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hpe.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 May 2016 18:30:13.3246 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 105b2061-b669-4b31-92ac-24d304d195dc X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AT5PR84MB0035 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:49:16 +0000 "N, Soumya P" wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the explanation. > I will take care of your comments and send v2 of the same patch. > >>No need, I just pulled in your patch and made the updates to the change log and subject myself. I'm starting my tests on it now. > Thanks Steve.