From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759337Ab0ECN1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 09:27:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f204.google.com ([209.85.222.204]:61037 "EHLO mail-pz0-f204.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759302Ab0ECN1K (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 09:27:10 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Nick Cheng" To: "'James Bottomley'" Cc: , References: <5B75F1A9B45A486E8A44B035EDCC381E@areca4e4f859d4> <1272891585.4369.15.camel@mulgrave.site> <543391074648471F8A10624BAC48E286@areca4e4f859d4> <1272893071.4369.24.camel@mulgrave.site> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3 ] SCSI: Support HW reset for EH and polling scheme for scsi device(This is correct revision, please ignore last one) Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 21:26:57 +0800 Organization: Areca Technology Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <1272893071.4369.24.camel@mulgrave.site> Thread-Index: Acrqw/opwvrf1vTSQO6AFgrSDMr5BgAABMtA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It seems I have to remove this section first then make a new patch for you. I will email the patches to you tomorrow. Thanks, -----Original Message----- From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@suse.de] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:25 PM To: nick.cheng@areca.com.tw Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3 ] SCSI: Support HW reset for EH and polling scheme for scsi device(This is correct revision, please ignore last one) On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 21:17 +0800, Nick Cheng wrote: > Hi James, > It seems you set CONFIG_SCSI_ARCMSR_AER. > Could you undefine it? Config option testing is part of the stuff I run through. Even if I undefine it, one of the many people who run automated config testing will pick it up ... and then I'll get email about it. > I will remove this section. Thanks. James