From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
johan.hedberg@gmail.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.11-final plan: unpriviledged user can crash the kernel (using bluetooth rfcomm)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 13:16:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B3715CDF-1D85-45C9-9AD1-DBBD0DF24624@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130901185038.GA11714@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Hi Pavel,
>>>>>> . Python sources for client/server are at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tui.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tui/tui/liveview/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> . My kernels like to warn about
>>>>> System is debian stable with gnome2.
>>>>
>>>> And no, it is not fixed in 3.11-rc7.
>>>
>>> 2.6.32-5-686 from debian seems to work.
>>
>> Could you try linux-next? We recently pushed a rework of the RFCOMM tty
>> handling, it should fix this. The work was too big to be pushed to 3.11
>
> So... In 3.11 unpriviledged user can crash the kernel, but the fix is
> too big, so we release it without the fix?
>
> Somehow, I don't think that's good idea.
can you boot a bluetooth-next kernel and see if the planned changes are fixing this or not. I would like to have that confirmed before we start any speculations here.
If the RFCOMM TTY rework that we have in bluetooth-next fixes this issue, then we can have a look at if this can be patched for 3.11 or a stable kernel without having to include the whole patch series. Or if the TTY subsystem changed from 2.6.32 so much that we have to take the whole changes.
However, please also note there is a different between RFCOMM sockets and RFCOMM TTYs. I would be curious if only the TTY part is affected or also the socket part.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-01 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-31 10:01 3.11-rc2: unpriviledged user crashes kernel using bluetooth Pavel Machek
2013-08-31 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2013-08-31 10:12 ` 3.10: " Pavel Machek
2013-08-31 10:14 ` 3.11-rc2: " Pavel Machek
2013-08-31 10:42 ` 3.11-rc7: " Pavel Machek
2013-09-01 16:55 ` Gustavo Padovan
2013-09-01 18:50 ` 3.11-final plan: unpriviledged user can crash the kernel (using bluetooth rfcomm) Pavel Machek
2013-09-01 20:16 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2013-09-01 22:12 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B3715CDF-1D85-45C9-9AD1-DBBD0DF24624@holtmann.org \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®