From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754055AbYKPPbz (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:31:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752319AbYKPPbp (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:31:45 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:27635 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752193AbYKPPbo (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:31:44 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=AKkb0PL0ZUXgoSAnhhYwsM5d3W+xA1WB17b5fn8Z9FXcqS72uMFI1m4eQCPUXzRxut 1MoKkGUUfJE22hzDmrKUqsftMRFYfOxAo3b8DxPQ4u2Eu5Oi4y+0Lj8RenL7bSES23Eu +um+AgC95FO543mvkCAGhRYdx77GPmU8wb9b8= References: <1226722577.3104.4.camel@LiNuX> <1226817681.3133.7.camel@LiNuX> <491FECAE.6050005@gmail.com> <200811161344.07872.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-Id: From: "Justin P. Mattock" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" In-Reply-To: <200811161344.07872.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5F136) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5F136) Subject: Re: ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, transactions will use polling mode Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:31:35 -0800 Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy , Alan Jenkins , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI , Len Brown Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cool, Then I'll just leave it as is And move on to other tasks that I have. Thanks for the info and help Regards; justin P. Mattock On Nov 16, 2008, at 4:44 AM, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > On Sunday, 16 of November 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: >> Justin P. Mattock wrote: >>> Well; reverting: >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=06cf7d3c7af902939cd1754abcafb2464060cba8 >>> is keeping the system from having a gpe storm >>> (for at least four hours now); >>> haven't had a chance to drain the battery and see >>> the affects from that scenario. >>> >>> >> Justin, by decreasing threshold, we just change how often >> _detection_ of >> the storm fires, not the storm itself. > > Yes, I think what happens is that we just detect the interrupt storm > with the > lower threshold, so the storm occured anyway previously, but it went > unnoticed > (not necessarily a good thing). > > There is nothing to worry about as long as the box works as expected. > > Thanks, > Rafael