From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] perf stat: Remove unused perf_counts.aggr field
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:02:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B51023CD-214D-4D85-8086-B7AA6B6701D8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014061550.463644-20-namhyung@kernel.org>
> On 14-Oct-2022, at 11:45 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The aggr field in the struct perf_counts is to keep the aggregated value
> in the AGGR_GLOBAL for the old code. But it's not used anymore.
>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/counts.c | 1 -
> tools/perf/util/counts.h | 1 -
> tools/perf/util/stat.c | 35 ++---------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.c b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> index 7a447d918458..11cd85b278a6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ void perf_counts__reset(struct perf_counts *counts)
> {
> xyarray__reset(counts->loaded);
> xyarray__reset(counts->values);
> - memset(&counts->aggr, 0, sizeof(struct perf_counts_values));
> }
>
> void evsel__reset_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.h b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> index 5de275194f2b..42760242e0df 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ struct evsel;
>
> struct perf_counts {
> s8 scaled;
> - struct perf_counts_values aggr;
> struct xyarray *values;
> struct xyarray *loaded;
> };
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> index 14c45f4cfdd3..6ab9c58beca7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> @@ -308,8 +308,6 @@ static void evsel__copy_prev_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
> *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, idx, thread);
> }
> }
> -
> - evsel->counts->aggr = evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr;
> }
>
> void evlist__copy_prev_raw_counts(struct evlist *evlist)
> @@ -320,26 +318,6 @@ void evlist__copy_prev_raw_counts(struct evlist *evlist)
> evsel__copy_prev_raw_counts(evsel);
> }
>
> -void evlist__save_aggr_prev_raw_counts(struct evlist *evlist)
> -{
> - struct evsel *evsel;
> -
> - /*
> - * To collect the overall statistics for interval mode,
> - * we copy the counts from evsel->prev_raw_counts to
> - * evsel->counts. The perf_stat_process_counter creates
> - * aggr values from per cpu values, but the per cpu values
> - * are 0 for AGGR_GLOBAL. So we use a trick that saves the
> - * previous aggr value to the first member of perf_counts,
> - * then aggr calculation in process_counter_values can work
> - * correctly.
> - */
> - evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
> - *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, 0, 0) =
> - evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr;
> - }
> -}
> -
> static size_t pkg_id_hash(const void *__key, void *ctx __maybe_unused)
> {
> uint64_t *key = (uint64_t *) __key;
> @@ -423,7 +401,6 @@ process_counter_values(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct evsel *evsel,
> int cpu_map_idx, int thread,
> struct perf_counts_values *count)
> {
> - struct perf_counts_values *aggr = &evsel->counts->aggr;
> struct perf_stat_evsel *ps = evsel->stats;
> static struct perf_counts_values zero;
> bool skip = false;
> @@ -493,12 +470,6 @@ process_counter_values(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct evsel *evsel,
> }
> }
>
> - if (config->aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL) {
> - aggr->val += count->val;
> - aggr->ena += count->ena;
> - aggr->run += count->run;
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -523,13 +494,10 @@ static int process_counter_maps(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> int perf_stat_process_counter(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> struct evsel *counter)
> {
> - struct perf_counts_values *aggr = &counter->counts->aggr;
> struct perf_stat_evsel *ps = counter->stats;
> - u64 *count = counter->counts->aggr.values;
> + u64 *count;
> int ret;
>
> - aggr->val = aggr->ena = aggr->run = 0;
> -
> if (counter->per_pkg)
> evsel__zero_per_pkg(counter);
>
> @@ -540,6 +508,7 @@ int perf_stat_process_counter(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> if (config->aggr_mode != AGGR_GLOBAL)
> return 0;
>
> + count = ps->aggr[0].counts.values;
Hi Namhyung,
We are using ps->aggr[0] here always. Can you please clarify on why first index is used here always.
Thanks
Athira
> update_stats(&ps->res_stats, *count);
>
> if (verbose > 0) {
> --
> 2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-16 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-14 6:15 [PATCHSET 00/19] perf stat: Cleanup counter aggregation (v2) Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 01/19] perf tools: Save evsel->pmu in parse_events() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-15 12:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 02/19] perf tools: Use pmu info in evsel__is_hybrid() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 03/19] perf stat: Use evsel__is_hybrid() more Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 04/19] perf stat: Add aggr id for global mode Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 05/19] perf stat: Add cpu aggr id for no aggregation mode Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 06/19] perf stat: Add 'needs_sort' argument to cpu_aggr_map__new() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 07/19] perf stat: Add struct perf_stat_aggr to perf_stat_evsel Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 08/19] perf stat: Allocate evsel->stats->aggr properly Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 09/19] perf stat: Aggregate events using evsel->stats->aggr Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 10/19] perf stat: Aggregate per-thread stats " Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 11/19] perf stat: Allocate aggr counts for recorded data Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 12/19] perf stat: Reset aggr counts for each interval Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 13/19] perf stat: Split process_counters() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 14/19] perf stat: Add perf_stat_merge_counters() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 15/19] perf stat: Add perf_stat_process_percore() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 16/19] perf stat: Add perf_stat_process_shadow_stats() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 17/19] perf stat: Display event stats using aggr counts Namhyung Kim
2022-10-15 13:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 18/19] perf stat: Display percore events properly Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 6:15 ` [PATCH 19/19] perf stat: Remove unused perf_counts.aggr field Namhyung Kim
2022-10-16 13:32 ` Athira Rajeev [this message]
2022-10-17 23:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-10-18 4:50 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-10-14 6:56 ` [PATCHSET 00/19] perf stat: Cleanup counter aggregation (v2) Jiri Olsa
2022-10-14 18:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 18:16 ` [PATCH 20/19] perf stat: Factor out evsel__count_has_error() Namhyung Kim
2022-10-14 20:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-10 5:35 [RFC/PATCHSET 00/19] perf stat: Cleanup counter aggregation (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-10-10 5:36 ` [PATCH 19/19] perf stat: Remove unused perf_counts.aggr field Namhyung Kim
2022-10-10 23:40 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-12 8:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-10-12 16:26 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B51023CD-214D-4D85-8086-B7AA6B6701D8@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®