From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751897AbeCWQTT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:19:19 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:42532 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471AbeCWQTS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:19:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:18:49 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <239ed1f7-cf4a-f187-549f-ea7e08b4e765@maciej.szmigiero.name> References: <30562911-7fde-782b-d1b2-03e30b6987c5@maciej.szmigiero.name> <20180322161130.GA11575@cz.tnic> <239ed1f7-cf4a-f187-549f-ea7e08b4e765@maciej.szmigiero.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] x86/microcode/AMD: Check patch size in verify_and_add_patch() To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" CC: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Boris Petkov Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On March 23, 2018 9:40:50 AM CDT, "Maciej S. Szmigiero" wrote: >It is possible to keep verify_patch_size() unmodified (with unsigned >int >and u32) but microcode container files >4GB in size then may be >rejected, If we ever have to support that - which I'm pretty sure we won't - more changes to the container format and parsing will be needed anyway. Thx. -- Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable.