From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753381Ab1DUNui (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:50:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:53448 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150Ab1DUNuh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:50:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JzxOSjpfg2fqkHoYVlvM+r/RiSUVFigK0aG9C0Y4c01D3n7Nnds1eWQa54xlja2pJz qZzC62l83JX97+ZeqGZ3pUsHWpWLErgSytcLBZ6cORTDdHZ09LXjHIFARnfvKrt5xJVX zkh0xG6z20b8q2gUcIVigao0w/4adCfJv4Sl4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110421134312.GA3225@zhy> References: <20110421132904.GA2702@zhy> <20110421134312.GA3225@zhy> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:50:35 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: deduplicate mm checks in normalize_rt_tasks() From: Hillf Danton To: Yong Zhang Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:29:04PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:15:56PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: >> > When normalizing realtime tasks, only user tasks are concerned by >> > checking their ->mm. >> > If the task is not realtime, the -mm is checked again, thus the >> > overwork could be removed. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton >> > --- >> > >> > --- a/kernel/sched.c        2011-03-30 03:09:48.000000000 +0800 >> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c        2011-04-21 20:59:28.000000000 +0800 >> > @@ -8364,7 +8364,7 @@ void normalize_rt_tasks(void) >> >                      * Renice negative nice level userspace >> >                      * tasks back to 0: >> >                      */ >> > -                   if (TASK_NICE(p) < 0 && p->mm) >> > +                   if (TASK_NICE(p) < 0) >> >> This looks good. >> >> And we can also move TASK_NICE(p) < 0 to the upper if(), >> like: >>               if (!rt_task(p) && TASK_NICE(p) < 0) { >>                       set_user_nice(p, 0); >>                       continue; >>               } >> >> to reduce one level if() to make code cleaner :) > > Damm, I'm wrong here, just ignore it. > Hi Yong We could not be fine every time, right? thanks Hillf > Yours is good. > > Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang > >> >> Thanks, >> Yong >> >> >                             set_user_nice(p, 0); >> >                     continue; >> >             } >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/