From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:17:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikhvhptDG-eRZ9uD5wSm3RxTn1RFw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimxmWiof9s5AvS3v_0X+sMiE=0x5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Yup, it's true.
Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
> {
> struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
>
> - if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> + if (next)
> return next->prio;
> else
> return MAX_RT_PRIO;
>
--
Only stand for myself
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-21 14:19 Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-05-24 11:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-24 14:20 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 14:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-05-24 14:26 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikhvhptDG-eRZ9uD5wSm3RxTn1RFw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®