From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755909Ab1DVOsr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:48:47 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.67]:9141 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753701Ab1DVOsq (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:48:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tvWwMy2V2yeNGhyKVNLs1hJPqSfb3IiDeFsemfNtn+1jSH2K8wepZvjox7v8wigOhx rTaSc80rpmVmlTtRI+EA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1303483678.4865.0.camel@laptop> References: <1303478798.2461.11.camel@localhost> <1303482702.2461.40.camel@localhost> <1303483678.4865.0.camel@laptop> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:48:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: perf_events: questions about cpu_has_ht_siblings() and offcore support From: Stephane Eranian To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Lin Ming , LKML , "mingo@elte.hu" , "Kleen, Andi" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:41 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> I assume that's because hotplug >> cpu is inherently serialized. You cannot have a CPU going offline >> and one going online at the same time. is that right? > > Exactly, that's all serialized under the hotpug mutex > Ok, thanks.