From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754220Ab1EOXU0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2011 19:20:26 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:42435 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753578Ab1EOXUZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2011 19:20:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=N+ZcGlASKCaZuRXbByQ/7NM/yP2A0v4k5ZFnJRtXu/iBW+Ybru8W5rsh+KYwfC2Svw 4/mTwo2POYMsBk7aCtD1CZb0kvipn0hlvo6fSSBcQjIutcA+3KOnEaQELHZcJWLXTmgv 0kr+KUkPyeNAEt8kAQ1p4HplhhLXTc/74HimU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110511144119.GC23897@sortiz-mobl> References: <1304687090-23401-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20110511144119.GC23897@sortiz-mobl> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 01:20:24 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _oSbV3nguMgpoXi6nuFowJcAKQ0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Ux500 PRCMU into MFD and update deps From: Linus Walleij To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2011/5/11 Samuel Ortiz : > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:39:03PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> 2011/5/6 Linus Walleij : >> >> > I will attempt to slim this down a bit, mainly the set is a >> > review point for the MFD maintainer to check out if the PRCMU >> > driver fits within MFD. >> >> Sam will you be able to provide some feedback on this so I know >> whether I shall plan to polish it up for the 2.6.40 merge window or >> not? > > I quickly looked at this patchset, and I hope to be able to review it better > next week. But overall I think this fits into the MFD mapped registers model. > So please go ahead and prepare this stuff for the .40 merge window (I'd > appreciate to see the "slimming this down a bit" part, while I expect to come > back to you with some more comments by next week. OK I have broken it into a *bit* smaller chunks by making a (yet complex) movement patch to get the stuff out of the mach-ux500 which I then patch to an acceptable level. I also pushed non-conflicting parts (all but 2 patches) to next for testing, applying them in parallell in MFD should work just fine, then I can take them off my branch. Thanks, Linus Walleij