From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757866Ab1FBAGU (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:06:20 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:57439 "EHLO mail-px0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315Ab1FBAGT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:06:19 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qoq2/X04vLJuxBtR7Vbg+c7m8jbE3E/zdU2vH3Hizl7+nCnfRH/KT4wokmxfvDp/yp 4PJMlSJr+AmISP09HRrmRjk2dUF/pJ6Q58nrwWv4aDr/WAUtq0w5R21OvSFQTSnQ2W1w TjUd6ki7Tkb6lZDVRDwd8GjxFvjUE4Sag+U9s= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110601225723.GA18471@suse.de> References: <20110601211506.GA16121@suse.de> <20110601225723.GA18471@suse.de> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:06:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Long-term stable versions in linux-2.6-stable.git? From: Bryan Hundven To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:33:21PM -0700, Bryan Hundven wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:38:35AM -0700, Bryan Hundven wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I was wondering if there are plans to include the long-term stable >> >> versions in the /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6-stable.git >> >> repository? >> >> >> >> I'm not subscribed to lkml, please cc on response. >> > >> > It's been discussed numerous times in the past, the thing is, I don't >> > control the script that does this so I have no control over it, sorry. >> >> Ok. The reason I ask is that it is painful to merge changes from >> 2.6.35.13 back to 2.6.35.9, then forward to >2.6.36, although I guess >> I will have to live with it. > > Why would you have to do that?  Why can't you just create the tree > yourself by pulling from the different longterm branches? That works too. Thank you! >> If you don't mind me asking; who controls the script that does this? > > I really don't know, sorry. >