From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261656AbULZObJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:31:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261657AbULZObJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:31:09 -0500 Received: from bay15-f26.bay15.hotmail.com ([65.54.185.26]:56868 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261656AbULZObH (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:31:07 -0500 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [61.10.7.56] X-Originating-Email: [mbenz74@hotmail.com] From: "M Benz" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: is my RAID safe? Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:30:36 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2004 14:31:05.0790 (UTC) FILETIME=[887EA5E0:01C4EB57] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Today I found this that at my /var/log/message (kernel 2.6.10): Dec 26 21:35:14 s1 kernel: ata5: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Dec 26 21:35:14 s1 kernel: ata5: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } ata5 is md raid1 with ata6, both are sata drives connected to a promise SATA controller. at /proc/mdstat, the raid 1 is still active with "[UU]" Is my raid 1 safe and should I replace the "ata5" drive? Also, why the raid-1 still up with status "[UU]" ? Thanks _________________________________________________________________ 使用全球用戶最多的電子郵件服務 MSN Hotmail： http://www.hotmail.com