From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262114AbUEOMHc (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 08:07:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262273AbUEOMHc (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 08:07:32 -0400 Received: from bay18-f22.bay18.hotmail.com ([65.54.187.72]:58373 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262114AbUEOMEn (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 08:04:43 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [67.22.169.229] X-Originating-Email: [jpiszcz@hotmail.com] From: "Justin Piszcz" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Linux 2.6.6 appears to be 3 to 4 times slower than 2.6.5. Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 12:04:42 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2004 12:04:42.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE275CC0:01C43A74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have memory benchmarks and compile benchmarks, essentially compiling takes ~5 sec on a 2.53ghz (533mhz bus/2GB ram box) for lilgp - genetic program ram =ddr 333 compiling takes ~15-20 sec on a 3ghz (not sure on bus/4gb ram box) for lilgp - genetic program ram = ddr 400 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/ramdisk/file bs=409e size=(64 or 256mb) it is 12% faster on the slower (2.53ghz box) vs the box w/DDR 400mhz ram Is anyone else having SERIOUS PROBLEMS with the 2.6.6 kernel as well? _________________________________________________________________ Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN Premium! http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/