mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paa Paa" <paapaa125@hotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Lower HD transfer rate with NCQ enabled?
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:11:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY20-F50719E454DCCF2309DA1AF9670@phx.gbl> (raw)

I'm using Linux 2.6.20.4. I noticed that I get lower SATA hard drive 
throughput with 2.6.20.4 than with 2.6.19. The reason was that 2.6.20 
enables NCQ by defauly (queue_depth = 31/32 instead of 0/32). Transfer rate 
was measured using "hdparm -t":

With NCQ (queue_depth == 31): 50MB/s.
Without NCQ (queue_depth == 0): 60MB/s.

20% difference is quite a lot. This is with Intel ICH8R controller and 
Western Digital WD1600YS hard disk in AHCI mode. I also used the next 
command to cat-copy a biggish (540MB) file and time it:

rm temp && sync && time sh -c 'cat quite_big_file > temp && sync'

Here I noticed no differences at all with and without NCQ. The times (real 
time) were basically the same in many successive runs. Around 19s.

Q: What conclusion can I make on "hdparm -t" results or can I make any 
conclusions? Do I really have lower performance with NCQ or not? If I do, is 
this because of my HD or because of kernel?

Best regards,
Paapaa

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-03  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-03  7:11 Paa Paa [this message]
2007-04-03  9:18 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 21:31   ` Paa Paa
2007-04-04  2:06     ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-06 21:33     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-03 16:31 ` Chris Snook
2007-04-03 16:47   ` Mark Lord
2007-04-03 19:17     ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-04 15:36       ` Mark Lord
2007-04-05 15:30         ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-05 16:11           ` Mark Lord
2007-04-05 16:45             ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-04-09 14:46             ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-10  3:58               ` Mark Lord
2007-04-05 16:26 Paa Paa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BAY20-F50719E454DCCF2309DA1AF9670@phx.gbl \
    --to=paapaa125@hotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome