From: "Paa Paa" <paapaa125@hotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Lower HD transfer rate with NCQ enabled?
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:11:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY20-F50719E454DCCF2309DA1AF9670@phx.gbl> (raw)
I'm using Linux 2.6.20.4. I noticed that I get lower SATA hard drive
throughput with 2.6.20.4 than with 2.6.19. The reason was that 2.6.20
enables NCQ by defauly (queue_depth = 31/32 instead of 0/32). Transfer rate
was measured using "hdparm -t":
With NCQ (queue_depth == 31): 50MB/s.
Without NCQ (queue_depth == 0): 60MB/s.
20% difference is quite a lot. This is with Intel ICH8R controller and
Western Digital WD1600YS hard disk in AHCI mode. I also used the next
command to cat-copy a biggish (540MB) file and time it:
rm temp && sync && time sh -c 'cat quite_big_file > temp && sync'
Here I noticed no differences at all with and without NCQ. The times (real
time) were basically the same in many successive runs. Around 19s.
Q: What conclusion can I make on "hdparm -t" results or can I make any
conclusions? Do I really have lower performance with NCQ or not? If I do, is
this because of my HD or because of kernel?
Best regards,
Paapaa
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 7:11 Paa Paa [this message]
2007-04-03 9:18 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 21:31 ` Paa Paa
2007-04-04 2:06 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-06 21:33 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-03 16:31 ` Chris Snook
2007-04-03 16:47 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-03 19:17 ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-04 15:36 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-05 15:30 ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-05 16:11 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-05 16:45 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-04-09 14:46 ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-10 3:58 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-05 16:26 Paa Paa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY20-F50719E454DCCF2309DA1AF9670@phx.gbl \
--to=paapaa125@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome