From: "Joseph Seigh" <jwseigh_055@hotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Futex wake behavior question
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:02:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY22-F224OPXok84FT00006346@hotmail.com> (raw)
(2nd try at posting this. from different email acct this time)
I have a question about futex wake behavior. On a uniprocessor is
it supposed to preempt the caller and dispatch the woken thread if
all threads in question have equal priority?
I was playing around with an experimental lock-free implementation
of condvars (no internal lock) and I got a 30% performance improvement
over NPTL's implementation which I didn't expect since the mutex the
condvar is bound to tends to be the gating factor. I did getrusage()
to get some stats and noticed the context switching was proportional
to the condvar signaling, the difference between the NPTL and lock-free
versions being one context switch which I attribute to NPTL's internal
mutex.
As a side note, since wait morphing doesn't appear to be currently
implemented in NPTL, you get a performance boost from signaling while
not holding the mutex since the first thing the woken thread does is
try to get the lock. Even with this technique, the lock-free condvar
does better.
This behavior would also cause problems for semaphores and tend to turn
semaphore calls into expensive coroutine calls.
So the question is, is this a feature or a bug? I'm on Suse 9.2 on
a uniprocessor. The kernel is 2.6.8-24 and NPTL is 2.3.3.
Joe Seigh
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
reply other threads:[~2004-11-10 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY22-F224OPXok84FT00006346@hotmail.com \
--to=jwseigh_055@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®