From: "Parag Sharma" <ps41@hotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question on the condition parameter in wait_event_interruptible()
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 10:05:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY99-F40XF2hzgOJ8P0001d374@hotmail.com> (raw)
I looked at the kernel 2.4.21 sources and found that the 'condition' in
calls to wait_event_interruptible() is usually a global variable. This
global variable is updated before the wakeup is issued.
It is not clear to me how this update to the global variable is seen by the
context that issued the wait_event_interruptible(). On certain processor
architectures and on SMP systems, is it possible that the update is not
reflected when the condition is tested in __wait_event_interruptible()?
If the answer to above is yes, then is it possible that there is a chance
that a wakeup might be missed when the update & wakeup occur either before
the call to add_wait_queue() or the call to
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) in __wait_event_interruptible()?
Thanks,
Parag
PS: Please cc me on the reply.
#define __wait_event_interruptible(wq, condition, ret) \
do { \
wait_queue_t __wait; \
init_waitqueue_entry(&__wait, current); \
\
add_wait_queue(&wq, &__wait); \
for (;;) { \
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
if (condition) \
break; \
if (!signal_pending(current)) { \
schedule(); \
continue; \
} \
ret = -ERESTARTSYS; \
break; \
} \
current->state = TASK_RUNNING; \
remove_wait_queue(&wq, &__wait); \
} while (0)
_________________________________________________________________
Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN
Premium! http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/
reply other threads:[~2004-05-26 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY99-F40XF2hzgOJ8P0001d374@hotmail.com \
--to=ps41@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®